Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
President Roosevelt was the 32nd president of the US, and describe this battle as a turning point because the Soviets had successfully stopped the German invasion.
<h3>What is the turning point of the battle?</h3>
A turning point in this discourse is an event that happened during the battle, after which some modern scholars would match that the ultimate outcome was fateful.
Roosevelt self-addressed Congress and inquire for a testimony of war against Japan. Afterward, Germany announced war on the US.
This American victory to play Japan in the Conflict of Midway was the turning point of the war in the Peaceable. It tagged the happening of the extremity of Japan's power of the Pacific Ocean.
Therefore, option B is correct.
To learn more about the turning point of the battle, refer to:
brainly.com/question/680418
<u>%Question%</u>
Describe the Hepburn Act. What did the act achieve, and why was it different from the previous.
<u> </u>
<u> &Answer&</u>
<em>The Hepburn Act is a 1906 United States federal law that gave the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) the power to set maximum railroad rates and extended its jurisdiction. This led to the discontinuation of free passes to loyal shippers.[1] In addition, the ICC could view the railroads' financial records, a task simplified by standardized bookkeeping systems. For any railroad that resisted, the ICC's conditions would remain in effect until the outcome of legislation said otherwise</em>
Answer:
d. William Penn
Explanation:
hope this helps, pls mark brainliest