Answer:
1,000 shares
Explanation:
The 318 attribution rule states that stock owned directly or indirectly by a partnership is considered to be owned by any partner that owns 5% or more in the business.
This is relevant to family owned businesses and is a way to mark out principal owners of a business in order to avoid tax evasion and fraud.
In this scenario John directly owns 700 of the outstanding shares. But according to the 318 attribution rule, since he he is a 50% partner he owns half of the outstanding 2,000 shares. That is 1,000 shares.
Answer:
Merchant wholesaler
Explanation:
A merchant wholesaler is a business owner that specializes in purchasing goods in large quantities and then sell to other retailers and wholesalers.
Since they purchase their products in large quantities, they have different warehouses in their acquisition. These warehouses are used to store the products.
Merchant wholesalers are very vital in the chain of distribution as they facilitate the smooth movement of goods which takes places between the producers and the retailers.
In the scenario described above, W.W. Grainger is an example of a merchant wholesaler.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Since for finding out whether the offer is accepted or not, first we have to determine the total cost at 600 number of players and for 601 number of players which is
The total cost of 600 players is
= 600 × $300
= $180,000
The total cost of 601 players is
= 601 × $301
= $180,901
Now the marginal cost is 601 player is $901 which is difference between the $180,000 and $180,901 that is higher than the offered price i.e $550
Therefore, the offer should not be accepted
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
Answer:
a) Market Value = $100 million × $20 = $2,000 million = $2 billion
Market value of equity would remain same = $2 billion
b) Market value would remain same after recap. Only market capitalization would reduce to half.
Market value of equity = 1 billion
c) Buying back shares increases the stock price which demonstrates the faith of the company in its work. But creditors have capital gains.
d) After recap and cash flow firm total value has increased to $2 billion + $100 Million = $2.1 billion and market value of equity has increased from $20 to $22 . ($1000 + $100)/50 = $22.
e) Equity shareholders have gained due to increase in there share value
Explanation:
