The answer to the following question is b
<span>to make sure that the reader knows it simply reading the step is not enough
</span>
The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
Answer:
The impact of point of view in "Two Kinds" carries great weight in its current state. The short story "Two Kinds" was written by the author Amy Tan and this story could be seen as a close representation of her childhood. The main characters of the story are the mother and the daughter. The story itself is told from the first person perspective from the daughter. We learn about how miserable she is with her mother's expectations of her. If the story were to be told from the mother's perspective, that would drastically change up how the story is told. I would expect a story more focused on hope, ambition, and the pursuit of happiness. The mother of the story came from a very terrible place in China and only wanted the best for her child even if she didn't quite see it yet. The whole tone of the story would be changed.
Explanation: