Answer: The term "constitution of identity" reflects how we see ourselves as a human being, through our perception of culture, family, relationships and experiences. We must always look for this constitution because it allows us to get to know ourselves better and understand what makes us unique and special.
Based on that, I took the liberty of reflecting on this concept, thinking about what constitutes my identity as an American, and I came to the conclusion that this identity is not linked specifically to the country where I was born, but to the culture that was built in those regions and in the United States. values that have been stimulated by my family for generations.
As we know the entire American continent was colonized and exploited, the Americans had to fight for their freedom and autonomy, as well as fight to establish a culture that reflected their own values and not European values, which did not fit our reality. This struggle in search of the goal, freedom and quality of life has always been very present in my family, from the parents of my grandparents until today, passing from generation to generation. I believe that this family "heritage" brings me closer to the American values that constitute my personality.
This taught me to be persevering, strong, to have confidence and above all to respect the struggle of other people, who have goals like mine, or even different, but who are all focused on always doing the best, like all American countries who do and have done the best for their people.
In short, I came to the conclusion that our formation as Americans is more linked to the concepts that the existence of that continent created, than to geographic location. Our identity, like our continent, teaches us to be strong, sufficient, free and fair, with all those who need it.
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The type of figurative language used would be simile. It<span> is a figure of speech that directly compares two things by using connecting words for instance like and as. Hope this answers the question.</span>
BTW MY SIS WROTE THIS
Probably not. Ambition, at the time of the play, was not taken in good light, obviously because it ruined the Great Chain of Being. Those in the chain were meant to stay in their place. What Macbeth and Lady Macbeth did were gravely wrong as they tried to get ahead and take the place of Duncan, which explains the constant unusual weather throughout the play.
Macbeth, only after constant badgering, antagonizing, and plotting from Lady Macbeth, could perform the murder. If you remember, when going to kill Duncan, what appeared in the hands of Macbeth was an imaginary dagger. What I have concluded about this scene (and I've certainly struggled over it) is that the dagger could be portrayed as a manifestation of his guilt. As he grapples in a soliloquy heading over to Duncan's room, the bloody dagger represents his wrongful ambition.
<span>The manifestation of his guilt is also represented after he kills Banquo. He says an extremely striking line to one of the murderers right after. </span>
<span>MACBETH
(aside to FIRST MURDERER) There’s blood upon thy face.
FIRST MURDERER
'Tis Banquo’s then.
MACBETH
'Tis better thee without than he within.
</span>
<span>What Macbeth is saying is that the blood of Banquo is better on the murderer's face then within Banquo's veins. We see a sudden twist in Macbeth's intentions and personality showing his character development and change throughout the play. But alas, his initial guilt comes to light when he suddenly is the only one who can see Banquo's ghost at the dinner table. Yes, another manifestation of his guilt. </span>
<span>We see that no matter how many murders he commits, he will always be human and feel guilty for his actions. The turning point in all this, is actually Lady Macbeth, not even the witches. Without the constant persuasion of Lady Macbeth to push Macbeth to the character he became, he wouldn't have committed any murders. </span>
<span>Another point to make is that when Banquo and Macbeth first received the prophecy from the witches, one can say that Banquo was more ambitious than Macbeth. He says to himself, </span>
<span>MACBETH
(aside) If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me
Without my stir.
</span>
<span>If fate puts kingship in my lap, only then I will take it. </span>
<span>If Lady Macbeth was your stereotypical wife, not a crazy psychopath, Macbeth probably would not have killed Duncan, and subsequently Banquo. Therefore I would blame Lady Macbeth, not particularly the three witches.</span>
The answer is C, Falling out of bed, Dustin hit his head on the night stand.
The answer to this question is:
John Stuart mill was a staunch proponent of"Individual Rights."
Hoped Thise Helped, <span>Show1time
</span>Your Welcome :)
