<u>Calculation of Return on Total Assets:</u>
Return on Total assets can be calculated using the following formula:
Return on Total Assets = Net Income / Total Assets
We can calculate Net income as follows:
Sales $2960
Less: Operating Costs $2675
Less: Interest charges $125
Income before tax = 160
Less: Tax (160*40%) = 64
Net Income = $96
Hence , Return on Total Assets = 96/2100 = 0.0457 =<u>4.57%</u>
Answer:
$315,250
Explanation:
total discount on bonds payable = $320,000 - $315,000 = $5,000
amortization of bond discount per coupon payment = $5,000 / 20 = $250
bonds carrying value after the first coupon payment is made = $315,000 + $250 = $315,250
Dr Interest expense 8,250
Cr Cash 8,000
Cr Discount on bonds payable 250
Answer:
B. historical cost
Explanation:
According to the historical cost principle, the assets should be valued at purchased cost whether the market value is more or less
Since in the question, it is mentioned that the Tim continues the commercial van value at the purchased cost only even the market price is available
So this represents the historical cost principle
Hence, the correct option is b,
Answer:
Yes, Sandra can claim Debbie as a qualifying relative on her yearly return as Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Information on the Form 1095-A must be allocated between their two tax returns.
Explanation:
When determining the premium tax credit on a tax return, a Shared Policy Allocation should then be reported by each taxpayer on their respective tax returns so that the amounts reported on the Health Insurance Marketplace Statement (Form 1095-A) can be allocated between the individuals on the policy.
A Shared Policy occurs when a qualified health plan has been purchased from the Marketplace or from a state health care exchange and it covers at least one individual on the tax return and at least one individual not on the tax return under several scenarios as the one with Sandra claiming Debbie or viceversa
, in their Shared Policy, they, as taxpayers, will need to allocate the three amounts reported on Form 1095-A (enrollment premiums, SLCSP premiums, and/or APTC) between the taxpayer's tax return and the tax return of the other individual(s) who is not on this tax return and is filing their own return. This is known as a Shared Policy Allocation.
Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Sandra got the 1095-A Form for she and Debbie´s covereage individuals for the year, therefore, Sandra can claim Debbie as a qualifying relative on her yearly tax return because Debbie lived with Sandra as a member of her household, unless Debbie has had gross income of more than $4,200 during the tax year.
Both Sandra and Debbie can claim the entire amount of the premium tax credit since both of their names are shown on Form 1095-A as covered individuals, but Sandra should reconcile the entire premium tax credit information from her Form 1095-A on her tax return, or Debbie should reconcile the entire premium tax credit information from Sandra's Form 1095-A on her tax return. Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Information on the Form 1095-A must be allocated between their two tax returns.
Answer:
Correct Answer is Option c
It is efficient to build the fence.
(The net profit is 100 to each for an entire of 200 and the cost is 150, consequently it is efficient. For example both contribute 75, and their evaluation is 100 so both are better off with the barrier built)
a) and b) are incorrect as disbursing more than the own evaluation is not a firmly conquered strategy and each player giving 100 will be corresponding to a total of 200 and it is not a Nash equilibrium as both can reduction what they pay and be better off.
d) There are Nash equilibria in which the fence is not built. (Assume one is paying 0, then the cost to be reserved up by the other one will be 150 and the evaluation is 100, so both paying 0 will be a Nash equilibria as neither have any inducement to deviate and pay alone).
