1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
4 years ago
12

How might a Walmart representative respond to the negative criticisms that might be brought up, and what other benefits could th

e representative offer the planning board to bolster Walmart’s case for gaining the board’s approval?
Business
1 answer:
Tomtit [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1. Owners of diminutive businesses located nearby.

As Wal-Mart offers comparatively low prices for the products, more and more customers will be magnetized to it and hence the minuscule businesses can lose their customers. But the overall business of the local area will increment as more people will come to buy in the Wal-Mart, after shopping in the Wal-Mart, they can stop for victualing street-aliment or do some street shopping or take some accommodations from street like shoe-polishing and all. Due to the Wal-Mart in the area, there will be demand for genuine estate as people will ask for the house near Wal-Mart.

2. Town denizens and denizens of nearby towns.

Town denizens will be ecstatic as they can find most of the things they optate under one roof. Due to this, they can preserve their time and mazuma. But there can be negative effects on environment, as so many trees are being cut to build a building and parking space. There can be incremented noise and air pollution due to the customers’ conveyances. Town denizens fear that there can be a sexual discrimination while giving employment and salaries.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

You might be interested in
Keys industries has assets of $2,100, sales of $2,960, operating costs of $2,675, and $250 of total current liabilities consisti
GalinKa [24]

<u>Calculation of Return on Total Assets:</u>

Return on Total assets can be calculated using the following formula:

Return on Total Assets = Net Income / Total Assets

We can calculate Net income as follows:

Sales $2960

Less: Operating Costs $2675

Less: Interest charges $125

Income before tax = 160

Less: Tax (160*40%)  = 64

Net Income = $96


Hence , Return on Total Assets = 96/2100 = 0.0457 =<u>4.57%</u>




5 0
3 years ago
On January 1, a company issued and sold a $320,000, 5%, 10-year bond payable, and received proceeds of $315,000. Interest is pay
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

$315,250

Explanation:

total discount on bonds payable = $320,000 - $315,000 = $5,000

amortization of bond discount per coupon payment = $5,000 / 20 = $250

bonds carrying value after the first coupon payment is made = $315,000 + $250 = $315,250

Dr Interest expense 8,250

    Cr Cash 8,000

    Cr Discount on bonds payable 250

7 0
3 years ago
Tim is the accountant of a trading firm. Two years ago, the company bought a commercial van that had a value of $10,000. The van
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

B. historical cost

Explanation:

According to the historical cost principle, the assets should be valued at purchased cost whether the market value is more or less

Since in the question, it is mentioned that the Tim continues the commercial van value at the purchased cost only even the market price is available

So this represents the historical cost principle

Hence, the correct option is b,

3 0
3 years ago
Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Information on the Form 1095-A must be allocated between their two tax returns. Both of
Airida [17]

Answer:

Yes, Sandra can claim Debbie as a qualifying relative on her yearly return as Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Information on the Form 1095-A must be allocated between their two tax returns.

Explanation:

When determining the premium tax credit on a tax return, a Shared Policy Allocation should then be reported by each taxpayer on their respective tax returns so that the amounts reported on the Health Insurance Marketplace Statement (Form 1095-A) can be allocated between the individuals on the policy.

A Shared Policy occurs when a qualified health plan has been purchased from the Marketplace or from a state health care exchange and it covers at least one individual on the tax return and at least one individual not on the tax return under several scenarios as the one with Sandra claiming Debbie or viceversa , in their Shared Policy, they, as taxpayers, will need to allocate the three amounts reported on Form 1095-A (enrollment premiums, SLCSP premiums, and/or APTC) between the taxpayer's tax return and the tax return of the other individual(s) who is not on this tax return and is filing their own return. This is known as a Shared Policy Allocation.

Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Sandra got the 1095-A Form for she and Debbie´s covereage individuals for the year, therefore, Sandra can claim Debbie as a qualifying relative on her yearly tax return because Debbie lived with Sandra as a member of her household, unless Debbie has had gross income of more than $4,200 during the tax year.

Both Sandra and Debbie can claim the entire amount of the premium tax credit since both of their names are shown on Form 1095-A as covered individuals, but Sandra should reconcile the entire premium tax credit information from her Form 1095-A on her tax return, or Debbie should reconcile the entire premium tax credit information from Sandra's Form 1095-A on her tax return. Sandra and Debbie have a shared policy. Information on the Form 1095-A must be allocated between their two tax returns.

3 0
3 years ago
Consider the voluntary contribution to building a fence game discussed in class. Assume that v1 = v2=100 and C=150, and select a
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

Correct Answer is Option c  

It is efficient to build the fence.  

(The net profit is 100 to each for an entire of 200 and the cost is 150, consequently it is efficient. For example both contribute 75, and their evaluation is 100 so both are better off with the barrier built)

a) and b) are incorrect as disbursing more than the own evaluation is not a firmly conquered strategy and each player giving 100 will be corresponding to a total of 200 and it is not a Nash equilibrium as both can reduction what they pay and be better off.

d) There are Nash equilibria in which the fence is not built. (Assume one is paying 0, then the cost to be reserved up by the other one will be 150 and the evaluation is 100, so both paying 0 will be a Nash equilibria as neither have any inducement to deviate and pay alone).

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An applicant for an individual health policy failed to complete the application properly. Before being able to complete the appl
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true when the economy is at full employment?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between a professional organization and a career and technical organization?
    8·2 answers
  • Tariffs are used to encourage global trade between two countries.<br><br><br> True<br><br><br> False
    5·2 answers
  • The market demand curve
    14·1 answer
  • What do you call a chicken that crosses the road
    15·2 answers
  • Which property of an object describe how easily electricity travels through it?
    8·1 answer
  • Place each of the items listed below in the appropriate subdivision of the stockholders' equity section of a balance sheet. Comm
    5·1 answer
  • the yellow company has a current ratio of 2.65 . The acid test ratio is 2.01 . The current liabilities of the are company $45,00
    12·1 answer
  • So people; how u doin? lol bored
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!