Answer:
The musicians will arrive on saturday morning; we should be there to greet them
Explanation: Here's an example: I have a big test tomorrow; I can't go out tonight. The two clauses in that sentence are separated by a semicolon and could be sentences on their own if you put a period between them instead: I have a big test tomorrow.
Leave a branliest if this helped
A satirist may make a subject ridiculous by comparing it to something undignified.
That way he diminishes the value of that subject and mocks it, creating a funny effect.
Answer: this is a sentence not a fragment :D
This is exactly like comparing a book to a movie - Except there is no visual stimulation with the sound.
I also can't help much - Considering I do not pursue the text. Try to find examples based on my explanation.
Listening to sound reading always affects the way you interpreted the scene during the silent reading - Mostly because there is stimulation of how you are SUPPOSED to feel during this exact moment. The intensity in the narrator's voice, each sound they make, it stimulates your imagination. A sound can make you think differently of a certain point in the text after you read it. Sometimes, the words may sound better when pronounced, too.
Even though, reading may help you perfect your writing, considering you will know how to write words better after seeing them. Writing takes years to perfect, and so does grammar, but by reading you can make it even better than before.
Not only that, but your imagination and interpretation during reading are always your way, and they will change if you listen to it.
I hope I helped! Kudos.
Stevenson requests a direct appeal of Walter’s conviction. In his written brief, he notes several flaws in Walter’s case, including faulty witness testimonies, State misconduct, racial bias in jury selection, and an unnecessary judge override of the jury’s life sentence. At the appeals court in Montgomery, Stevenson appears before Chief Judge John Patterson, the KKK-backed former Alabama governor notorious for resisting de-segregation and refusing to allow law enforcement to protect the Freedom Riders from violent mobs. At the end of Stevenson’s oral argument, Judge Patterson responds by asking Stevenson where he is from. Stevenson, caught off guard, responds that he “lives in Montgomery.” Stevenson regrets dissuading Walter’s family from requesting time off to travel to Montgomery, now wondering if their supportive presence would have helped distinguish Walter’s case. The State’s lawyer defends Walter’s conviction as “routine” and his sentence as “appropriately imposed.” Judge Patterson denies the appeal.
Stevenson encourages Walter to remain hopeful because they have new evidence and several remaining options, including a reconsideration of the direct appeal decision. Stevenson recently hired Michael O’Connor, a son of Irish immigrants and recovered heroin addict originally from a rough neighborhood. Though Michael regards his history of addiction with regret, Stevenson sees his background as an asset to their work. Stevenson and his colleagues have discovered records showing that county officials paid Bill Hooks and “somehow” had his city criminal charges dropped, which is information that the State should legally have disclosed pre-trial. They also found flyers advertising the fish fry held at Walter’s house, which confirmed it was held the day of the murder. They contacted Walter’s mechanic, who discredited Bill Hook’s testimony by confirming that the mechanic modified Walter’s truck six months after Ronda’s murder. Finally, a clerk at the store where Myers was asked to identify Walter confirms that Myers had to ask which black man was Walter.
Stevenson’s determination to pursue all available recourses for Walter demonstrates his perseverance and commitment to this case. Stevenson’s positive reaction to Michael’s story of addiction serves to reinforce the book’s emphasis on the importance of redemption. By framing Michael’s past mistakes as assets, Stevenson implies that he values having staff members who can identify with the population they serve. Michael’s past allows him to see clients as more fully human, and enables clients to trust Michael more easily. Stevenson implies that county officials conducted illegal activity, which they intentionally hid. Further, he implies that the corruption included collaboration with city, everything.”
