3) How was the new government (civil political body] similar or different from the monarchy in Great Britain?

History

1 answer:

cestrela7 [59]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The new government of civil political body similar or different from the monarchy in Great Britain is explained below in details.

Explanation:

The formal way of representing the British government is to declare that the United Kingdom has the parliamentary government under a constitutional kingship. This has emerged in the development of a whole range of institutions whose associations are administered by the convention rather than the statue.

The purpose of the Monarch is often described as a secondary role within the UK political system, as the Queen has no significant political authority.

However, this does not mean that the Queen has no political authority.

You might be interested in

Name the two states which touch the western border of olkahoma

Alik [6]

<span>Nevada and California is your answer</span>

6 0

4 years ago

True or False: The French avoid further reforms and revolutions because Napoleon Il distracted the people with industrialization

erastovalidia [21]

Answer:true

Explanation:When Napoleon took over France and became emperor, he not only had effectively destroyed the French revolution, by turning it into everything it was opposed to, an absolutist regime, but what's more, Napoleon smothered the forces of emancipation awakened by the French and American revolutions all over Europe.

sorry if this is not what your looking for

4 0

3 years ago

Conventions , pacts , protocols , and accords are considered

Dominik [7]

Answer:

Conventions, pacts, protocols, and accords are all considered treaties.

6 0

3 years ago

Probably the main reason Africans , rather than native Americans , became slaves in America was that

Alexandra [31]

They were immune to the deceases and where more used to being slaves since they were in africa as well

3 0

3 years ago

The federalist felt that a bill of rights did not need to be added to the constitution. The anti-federalist, on the other hands,

tatiyna

1) The federalist felt a bill of rights did not need to be added because they had the 7 prinples
The Anti-federalist felt the bill of right s should be added because they felt that the national government was going to be too strong

2) The Anti-federalist won

3) the anti federalists one because the federalists needed the anti federalists to sign the Constitution

7 0

4 years ago