1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lyudmila [28]
2 years ago
5

What did the United States do in response to Japan's invasion of French Indochina?

History
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]2 years ago
6 0
As a response to Japan's invasion of French Indochina, the United States "<span>D. froze all of Japan's financial assets in the United States," since it was thought that this would put enough pressure on the Japanese to release their "grip" on the region. </span>
You might be interested in
The United States and France first became ____________ in the 18th century.
soldi70 [24.7K]
The answer is A <span>allies  </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why, most likely, didn't george washington feel he could spend the winter of 1782-83 at home in mount vernon even though there w
Assoli18 [71]
His troops seemed to be in such an ugly mood.
I hope this helps. :)
5 0
3 years ago
Write a paragraph on How Franklin D. Rooseveltt was elected 4 times.
In-s [12.5K]

On November 5, 1940 Franklin D. Roosevelt broke a long-held precedent—one that started with George Washington—when he became the first president elected to a third term. Roosevelt would go on to vie for, and win, yet a fourth term, taking office again on January 20, 1945.

FDR was the first, and last, president to win more than two consecutive presidential elections and his exclusive four terms were in part a consequence of timing. His election for a third term took place as the United States remained in the throes of the Great Depression and World War II had just begun. While multiple presidents had sought third terms before, the instability of the times allowed FDR to make a strong case for stability.

“You have economic-domestic issues and you have foreign policy with the outbreak of World War II in 1939,” says Barbara Perry, professor and director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “And then you have his own political viability—he had won the 1936 election with more than two-thirds of the popular vote.”

Eventually U.S. lawmakers pushed back, arguing that term limits were necessary to keep abuse of power in check. Two years after FDR’s death, Congress passed the 22nd Amendment, limiting presidents to two terms. Then amendment was then ratified in 1951.

At the time of FDR’s third presidential run, however, “There was nothing but precedent standing in his way,” says Perry. “But, still, precedent, especially as it relates to the presidency, can be pretty powerful.”

Other U.S. Presidents Who Tried and Failed to Win a Consecutive Third Term

According to the National Constitution Center, most of the framers of the Constitution were against term limits, and, although amendments seeking to enforce them were proposed some 200 times between 1796 and 1940 without being adopted, most two-term presidents followed Washington’s precedent in not seeking reelection for a third time.

Still, some had tried. Ulysses S. Grant lost a third campaign in 1880, when James Garfield clinched the Republican nomination. Theodore Roosevelt lost his bid at a third nonconsecutive term in 1912 to William Howard Taft (he had previously served out the remainder of President William McKinley's term and then won reelection). And Woodrow Wilson lost the Democratic nomination in 1920. Harry Truman, who succeeded FDR after his death, was president when the 22nd Amendment passed and so was exempt from the new rule. Truman campaigned for a third term in 1952, but withdrew after losing in the New Hampshire primary.

Roosevelt’s campaign for a third term took place as the United States had not yet entered World War II, and the president was still trying to hold the line in an isolationist pattern.

“He was trying to guide us along to try to keep Britain afloat with things like lend-lease,” Perry says. “That obviously was preying on his mind and he didn’t think that the U.S. should ‘change horses in midstream’ as this war was building towards what he knew would eventually be our full-fledged intervention in both the European and Pacific theaters.”

Roosevelt’s defeat of Republican challenger Governor Alf Landon of Kansas was a rout—the fourth-largest electoral vote margin ever. His 1940 win against Republican businessman Wendell Willkie wasn’t quite as impressive, but he still won 55 percent of the popular vote, and took the electoral vote 449 to 82.

Republicans Led the Drive for Presidential Term Limits

This photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt seated at his desk was the last color image of him before the announcement of his death.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Of course, not everyone was on Roosevelt’s side. The National Constitution Center notes that his decision to run for a third term resulted in key Democratic supporters and advisors leaving his campaign.

Some political buttons from the time read “FDR Out at Third,” and Perry notes that despite his popularity, one-third of Americans, particularly business people and those with means, still voted against him. They argued he was taking America down the road of socialism.

“Famously, there were people who would refuse to speak of him by name and would call him ‘That Man,’” Perry says. “But he knew the popular vote and the electoral vote were on his side. He wanted to see us through the two greatest catastrophes of the 20th century and he succeeded.”

Term Limits Were Set to Guard Against Tyrannical Rule

In 1944, according to the National Constitution Center, term-limit talk again came into focus. Republicans were at the forefront of the movement, though many Democrats agreed with the eight-year precedent set by Washington to guard against tyrannical rule.

“Four terms or 16 years is the most dangerous threat to our freedom ever proposed,” Thomas Dewey, Roosevelt’s Republican opponent, said in a 1944 speech.

4 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer.
kramer

Answer:

Definition of Rising Action. Rising action in a plot is a series of relevant incidents that create suspense, interest, and tension in a narrative. In literary works, a rising action includes all decisions, characters' flaws, and background circumstances that together create turns and twists leading to a climax.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP PLZ BRAINLY IF CORRECT AND GOOD UNDERSTANDING(12+points)
Artyom0805 [142]
The demonization of Muslims, police brutality against people of color, and a recent rise in white supremacist mentality
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you think was Montezuma’s reason  for showing the statues to Cortés?
    15·1 answer
  • How did town meetings affect the governing of new england colonies?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the congressional reconstruction unsuccessful and successful?
    11·1 answer
  • What did Marcus Garvey advocate for blacks? improvement of separate but equal facilities for both blacks and whites education fo
    11·2 answers
  • Item 2
    11·2 answers
  • What are 3 examples of religious imagery used by du bois
    9·1 answer
  • Uwu help with these questions plz​
    8·2 answers
  • Name the four ancient river valley civilizations?<br> please dont scam this for the points
    6·2 answers
  • American politics has become more divisive, more extreme, and unable to compromise.
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Proclamation of 1763 do?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!