Answer:
C. Shays's Rebellion.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the US, it lasted from 1776 until 1789, established a weak central government and gave most of the powers to the states.
Under the Articles of Confederation economy of US stumble as the central government lacked the power to enforce tax laws and regulate commerce.
Shays rebellion also revealed its weakness of federal government as it was unable to finance the troops. It was a rebellion of Revolutionary War veterans. The rebellion was finally put down by a privately funded local militia and Massachusetts State militia as the federal government was unable quell it.
Shays rebellion and lack of powers of central government revealed the weakness and the widely held view was to amend the constitution and reform the government.
Answer:
The ability to grow sugar in Britain and France is an important concept as it eliminates the dependency on other regions for sugar. Also, it allows Britain and France to be able to grow a surplus of sugar and eventually implement it into their global market for trade and profit.
Answer: a single-issue party
Explanation:
Answer:
Southerners argued for states rights and a weak federal government.
Explanation:
It is however possible to give a general perspective behind southern states reasoning.
Slavery is the most apparent example. I won't go into depth because it's been discussed several times. Slavery, on the other hand, had far-reaching and multifaceted consequences in pre-war America. Slavery, for example, became one of the most contentious topics during westward expansion. It was one of the most pressing concerns to be addressed as new territories were established and new states were admitted to the Union. The reason was simple: a balance between slave and free states was required to preserve the Constitution and its amendments.''
The second thing, which is also tied to slavery, are the States rights,especially a right of individual state to seceede from the Union. The political and legal debates about this particular state right are still ongoing. The southern states decided that the matter was important enough to take up arms and fight over it.
Then there are social and economic aspects. The Southern society was extremely aristochratic. This doesn’t mean that in the North there was no aristocracy, but average person in the North had way more oportunities to make a good life. In the South, hard work, witts and ability would lead you only as far as your bloodline would allow it. Before the Civil War, USA politics were dominated by Southern politicians, and there is no better evidence than preservation of slavery which couldn’t be abolished through politics in the Congress.
North and South were also opposites when it comes to production. South’s main cash products were sugar, tobacco and cotton. However they were mostly exported as bulk products and shipped to either North or Europe where other would make a final product that can be sold at much higher cost (like clothes). North started to become more independent from European goods. It still imported a lot of them, but factories and industries were built that aimed to make those same products at home and not to import them from overseas. South was unable to form any substantial industry, apart from cotton gin they never developed any industty aimed at making the final product amd exporting it.
This two reasons esentially made South a reneisance society in industrial revolution world. The average Southener was disgusted by crowded industrial cities of the North, where people lived in conditions that were often worse than what slaves had to endure. The society of the South resisted industrial progres from its very core.
Thanks,
Eddie
If by Christian Church you mean Catholic Church(as their was and is the Eastern Orthodox, which historically didn't get along well with Catholics) then the Reformation.
