The prince's assignment seems to be a secondary source of heritage mostly on a basis including its description provided in the previous section.
What was the secondary source?
- Using a synthesis of primary sources, academic journal articles, and other secondary sources, secondary source books are written by scholars and present a fresh interpretation or thesis.
- Sometimes you'll need to piece together information from numerous monographs, and other times you'll find a full book.
- Secondary sources typically include a bibliography with resources for further research.
- Due to the fact that even the Chinese prince wrote some documents many years after the events they purport to represent, they fall under the category of secondary sources and are thus not primary.
- Useful techniques, including both primary and secondary sources of information, for learning about historical occurrences that take place in a single location.
To know more about Secondary source visit :
brainly.com/question/17751886
#SPJ9
<span>The Panic was the worst economic crisis to hit the nation in its history to that point. Economic historians are not certain what caused it but point to several possible factors. First, too many people attempted to redeem silver notes for gold; ultimately the statutory limit for the minimum amount of gold in federal reserves was reached and U.S. Notes could no longer be successfully redeemed for gold. Next, the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad went bankrupt. Then, the National Cordage Company (the most actively traded stock at the time) went into receivership as a result of its bankers calling their loans in response to rumors regarding the NCC's financial distress. A series of bank failures followed, and the price of silver fell. The Northern Pacific Railway, the Union Pacific Railroad and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad all failed. This was followed by the bankruptcy of many other companies; in total over 15,000 companies and 500 banks failed (many in the west). About 12%-18% of the workforce was unemployed at the Panic's peak.
hope this makes sense</span>
Territory on the Mississippi River and in Florida
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, An executive arrangement refers to the relationship among the Leaders of Governance of 2 or several nations which the parliament has not approved when the negotiations are claimed. Executive contracts are deemed constitutionally binding by separating them from contractually enforceable treaties. Congress also allowed presidents to conclude several executive conferences. Two instances are those for which mail and NAFTA systems