1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
8

Bhutan, Thailand, Malaysia, and Cambodia are all __________. A. constitutional monarchies B. military juntas C. presidential rep

ublics D. parliamentary republics
History
2 answers:
zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago
8 0
Bhutan, Thailand, Malaysia, and Cambodia are all <span>constitutional monarchies.
Monarchy a type of government that is run by royalty. (Kings, and Queens)</span> 
They have a constitution that is needed to be followed, but just remember not all the power is at the hands of the King. 

Answer: <span>A. constitutional monarchies

Good luck with your studies, I hope this helps~!</span>
Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Bhutan, Thailand, Malaysia, and Cambodia are all constitutional monarchies.

Monarchy a type of government that is run by royalty. (Kings, and Queens) 

They have a constitution that is needed to be followed, but just remember not all the power is at the hands of the King. 

Answer: A. constitutional monarchies

Good luck with your studies, I hope this helps~!

Click to let others know, how helpful is it

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/2816134#readmore

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Based on the graph, what conclusion best describes grain production during the Great Leap Forward from 1958–60?
tatiyna
Based on the graph, the conclusion that best describes grain production during the great leap forward from 1958-60 c. it went down causing a drop in food production and famine.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement most correctly describes surrogacy?
TEA [102]
D a finalizing a crawl woman and planting into another’s woman uterus what are you doing
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
La propagande antisemite
bija089 [108]

Answer:

The Second World War, propaganda and anti-Semitism

In September 1939, shortly after Germany invaded Poland, Joseph Goebbels, the Reich Minister of Propaganda, dictated a memo demanding more Nazi ‘wall newspapers’, or posters. ‘Everywhere in the Reich where there is dense traffic, poster boards of the Nazi party are to be set up’, Goebbels insisted. ‘All means of transport (railroad, streetcars, subways, buses, and so on) will receive posters, which are to be placed in every wagon, on the train platforms, in the ticket windows, as well as in the entrances to these forms of public transport’ (fig.2). As historian Jeffrey Herf explains, ubiquitous political posters – named Parole der Woche, distributed by the thousands every week from 1936 to 1945 and strategically displayed all over Germany – were a primary means of asserting Nazi ideology and, in particular, radical anti-Semitism.2

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Did Benjamin Franklin sign the constitution? Why or Why Not??
GalinKa [24]
Yes he did because it was "more close to any other plan." (Btw quoted from my textbook)
6 0
3 years ago
Using what you have learned, write one to two paragraphs comparing and contrasting the rise of the nation-state in Germany and J
Verizon [17]

For Germany, the nation-state had its antecedents with Franco -Prussian war in the late 1800s and Japan in the Russia-Japanese war that lead to creating the modern nation-state. A clear example of similarities between this two models is found in that Japan set its constitution according to the German constitution. Furthermore: the public educational system in Japan also had many similarities with the German public educational system.

Nationalism was key for this purpose: it helped consolidate power for Germany and Japan as recently formed modern states, and as a result, both states became international actors posing changes and threats in the politic and economic relations of the region and eventually in the world.

Similarities:

In the case of Germany and Japan, it helped unite people with the common language and cultural background. It created a deep sense of belonging among them. Before the rise of this nation-states for the case of both, there was already a role in politics and regional- foreign trade but it wasn't until they consolidated at states that it became also a power over the region. (Germany as a fully emerged power in Europe and Japan in Asia).

Differences:

Japan had been in a isolation for a very long time under a whole different cultural system  (the Shogun) and with the emergence of the nationalism under the rule of Emperor Meiji it started to fully engage in the foreign trade that also eventually paved the way for the creation of a powerful army. (Without Japanese nationalism it would have been hard to imagine the onward expansion and intervention abroad).

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What highschool did mark moseley come from?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the legend of King Arthur most likely written? to illustrate the importance of magic in the past to portray true love be
    7·1 answer
  • Help witch one is it B or D
    6·2 answers
  • never mind......................................................................................................................
    11·2 answers
  • Need help A.S.A.P! I can give Brainliest!!
    8·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe Portugal’s claim to Brazil?
    8·1 answer
  • Henry Ford used this process to produce cars quickly.
    11·1 answer
  • How does the bill of rights protect the unalienable rights
    6·2 answers
  • Nation.
    9·2 answers
  • What was the Japanese government’s perspective on the Pearl Harbor attack?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!