<span> </span><span>He did not support the Mexican War and he felt that if he paid, that he was technically supporting it. I just read Civil Disobedience and it was very hard for me to understand. Thoreau seems to babble on and on, and then contradict himself.
But, I do know that he did not like the Mexican War and that he spent one night in jail for not paying his taxes. He would've stayed longer, but family members paid the tax for him.
SO THE ANSWER IS HE WAS SENT TO JAIL
PLEASE MAKE THIS ANSWER THE BRANLIEST IF THIS HAS HELPED YOU </span>
Dear director.
I know that you are a man concerned with the quality instruction that our students receive and so I decided to write you this letter to show the importance of implementing classes with moral lessons, to promote the benefit to students, the school and society in general.
Lessons with moral lessons will be beneficial to help students distinguish between correct and incorrect behaviors, this can shape their personality and their awareness of the world and how they should act on different occasions in all aspects of their lives.
Another benefit caused by this type of class is that students will learn to respect the social and cultural differences present in our environment. In this way, we will form tolerant individuals who will fight prejudice and racism, in addition to promoting equality and respect in their communities.
Another positive aspect of the application of this type of class are the social, political and economic benefits that these students will be able to develop throughout their lives, since they will have the basis to promote good in any situation that they are inserted.
I believe that you will recognize other benefits besides those listed in that letter and I look forward to hearing your opinion.
Kind regards,
Mary Lin.
Answer:
Find the supporting evidence the author provides.
Explanation:
An argumentative writing can be defined as an expression of a writer's position (stance) on a subject matter or topic.
A claim can be defined as a statement that is used by a writer to prove, substantiate or support an argument.
On the other hand, a counterclaim is an assertive statement made to offset, refute or oppose a claim. A counterclaim is considered to be a rebuttal.
Thus, a claim is an assertive statement expressed by a writer to prove that an argument is true or real.
This ultimately implies that, when writers engage in an argument or write an argumentative essay, they make use of a claim to state or express their opinions about the subject matter or topic.
Also, a thesis statement is a brief, concise summary of a claim or main idea stated in a literary work. It is usually written at the conclusion (tail end) of an introduction in an article.
When you analyze the claim made by an author, the next step you should take after identifying the claim is to look or find the supporting evidence that's being provided by the author. This supporting evidence would help you in assessing and determining the credibility of his or her claims. Also, it's used to check whether or not the conclusion drawn from the claims are reliable, logical, and trustworthy.
Rhythm can be described as the beat and pace of a poem. Rhythm is created by the pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables. in a line or verse. Rhythm can help to strengthen the meaning of words and ideas in a poem.
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
