The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.
As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.
Answer:
The US war on drugs and its legacy in Latin America ... The legacy of the US-funded war on drugs in Latin America is profound even as its impact has been ... to dictate the implementation of policy as it did in the 70s and 80s.
Explanation:
google said it
Answer:
In explanation down below
Explanation:
English leader. Spied on colonists forming a militia. Fought at battles Lexington and concord.
<u>General William Howe:</u> British commander who replaced Genergal Gage was critized allowing Washington leave the Battle of Long Island.
<u>General George Washington: </u>Lead the continental army turned militia into sodiers and lead the win at yorktown aganist Corn Wallace.
<u>General John Burgoyne:</u> Led the bruitish attacks helped fight in Battle of Saratoga and was forced to surrender. Disclamer: Most people hate this commander.
Answer:
In the context of the history of slavery in the Americas, free people of color (French: gens de couleur libres; Spanish: gente de color libre) were people of mixed African, European, and sometimes Native American descent who were not enslaved. The term arose in the French colonies, including La Louisiane and settlements on Caribbean islands, such as Saint-Domingue (Haiti), St.Lucia, Dominica, Guadeloupe, and Martinique, where a distinct group of free people of color developed. Freed African slaves were included in the term affranchis, but historically they were considered as distinct from the free people of color. In these territories and major cities, particularly New Orleans, and those cities held by the Spanish, a substantial third class of primarily mixed-race, free people developed. These colonial societies classified mixed-race people in a variety of ways, generally related to visible features and to the proportion of African ancestry.[citation needed] Racial classifications were numerous in Latin America.
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I believe that this is the answer but I'm not sure about this question but I'm very confident
