Answer:
d. the search process of matching workers with jobs.
Explanation:
Frictional unemployment is also called "Search Unemployement" is base on the individual's circumstances and is independent of the economy. Commonly is the time "between jobs" when the person is searching for a new job or transitioning from one job to another. This is a temporary unemployement and it can be though like a good sign for the economy since it idemonstrates that people are looking a better job that the one they had before.
Answer with Explanation:
The negligence act would be used here and for a plaintiff to prove to win the suit following four factors must have to be proved which are:
- Duty of care
- Breach
- Cause
- Harm
<u>Part 1. Duty of Care</u>
The railroad company owed a duty of care to every person rail station and the way they had exercised this duty of care was in the form of red light that David Harris saw, which means they exercised reasonable duty of care to avoid the misshapen. This means the duty of care that David Harris owes to himself was not crossing the yellow line.
<u>Part 2. Breach</u>
In fact David Harris was the one to avoid the red light signal and was out of the yellow line. So the breach of duty of care was of David Harris not of the railroad company.
<u>Part 3. Cause</u>
The cause of the breach of duty of care by David Harris was negligence because neither was the railroad signals were allowing him nor he was saving somebody else's life.
<u>Part 4. Harm</u>
Yes, the negligence of David Harris resulted in his death which is the most harm a person can suffer.
<u>Conclusion:</u>
As only harm was satisfactory not the other 3 factors were in the favor of plaintiff, so the widow's argument is incorrect and David Harris was negligent not the railroad company. Hence railroad company owes nothing in compensation to the David Harris's widow.
Answer:
Option "C" is the correct answer to the following question.
Explanation:
If the Toyota company was unable to supply vehicles due to unexpected acceleration problems, it reflected both legal and ethical losses. On the moral side, the Toyota company will suffer a loss of reputation, assuming the Toyota company was misrepresenting, while the Toyota company will also face legal problems.
Answer:
Inventory = $8.17190
Explanation:
First compute the total current assets:
Current Ratio = <u> Current Assets </u>
Current Liabilities
0.95 = <u>Current Assets</u>
25.3
Current Assets = 25.3 * 0.95
Current Assets = 24.035
Now,
Current Assets = 100%
Less: Cash = (43%)
Account Receivable = <u>(23%)</u>
Inventory = 34%
Now,
Inventory = Current Assets * Inventory%
Inventory = 24.035 * 34%
Inventory = $8.1719
If the company's trend increases by 12.3% over the previous year and this is bound to continue then the percentage increase through a given number of months will be given by:
(1+ 0.123)∧m/12
we get (1.123)∧m/12
Simplifying the expression we get (1.123)∧(1/12)m
Evaluating (1.123)∧(1/12) we get 1.00971
Therefore, the expression to represent monthly percentage increase will be
(1.00971)∧m
