Answer:
<em>The </em><em>nosy</em><em> visitors observed the lions' routine for nearly an hour before moving on.</em>
Explanation:
In this passage, we have a description of an average safari with a lot of tourists trying to capture the perfect photo, no matter what it takes. It is obvious that the lions are not a fan of it, as the people keep mingling around them, staring, making noise, etc, so it is almost like in a zoo. So, the author used the neutral word <em>curious</em>, while <em>nosy</em>, meaning <em>being too much into others` business</em>, is more suitable, but only if we want, like it is said, to create a more negative connotation.
The name of the fallacy with the statement "The Gorps would have you believe that all you need to be happy is green beans, but those of us with heads on our shoulders know better'' is <em>argumentum ad lapidem </em>or appeal to the stone. This is the answer because the speaker is implying that the argument of Gorps is absurd but he is not providing any information or evidence that it's absurd. His only evidence is that 'those among us with heads on ours shoulders know better' and that's it.
