Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Trade between two countries allows both countries to consume products and services beyond their production borders, but it does not allow countries to produce beyond that border. This is because the production frontier is the term that refers to the total limit of products and services that a country is capable of producing, taking into account all the resources and technology it has. However, trade between two countries allows citizens to consume beyond the production frontier, since each country has access to the production of the other.
The evidence that supports the inference that Europe was dangerous for merchants is "guaranteed the safety of any merchant," as stated in option B.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
We can define an inference as a conclusion that we make based on information that we have. In the question, we are told that the inference is "Europe was dangerous for merchants to travel before the 1100s."
We need to find the evidence, that is, the piece of information that supports the inference above. The best option is letter B, "guaranteed the safety of any merchant," since it conveys the idea that merchants needed some sort of security to help them travel by.
With the information above in mind, we can choose option B as the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about inference here:
brainly.com/question/2095640
#SPJ1
Are there options if there are plz give them to me so i can help u k
Answer:
Ooooooh my fav subject
the Lotus, or you lose your hope of home.
Answer:
A. A paradox is more of a contradiction than an affirmation.
B. No, a change in the environment would not likely be lethal to a highly adaptable species.
Explanation:
A. The official definition of a paradox, as provided by Merriam-Webster dictionary, is "a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true". Therefore, it would be more of a contradiction because the things that are mentioned in them do not coincide. An example of a paradox would be the statement "There is no absolute truth". This is contradictory because you saying that there is no such thing as absolute truth yet you are also saying it definitively as if it were absolute truth. So, if there is no absolute truth, but the statement has an absolute truth claim, then the statement does not make sense and is a paradox.
B. If a species is highly adaptable, then it would be able to withstand any changes in the environment because it would adapt in each and every change. The changes in environment would not likely be lethal in this regard, and as a result, the species would not die off.