Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
Answer:
Schaie and willis' re-organizational stage of cognitive development occurs in the young-old years
Explanation:
A stage theory wherein human intellectual procedures are set to create inside up to five periods during the life expectancy is what is discussed by Schaie. In the main, acquisitive stage, a person's essential subjective undertaking is to get learning and scholarly aptitudes. Comparing to formative methodologies, for example, that of Jean Piaget, this stage happens from the outset through adolescence.
The hypothetical model presented by Share bases in the satisfaction of inspirational points along the imperative cycle that go addressing to the three inquiries clarified already
It was because Indian citizens were forced to buy the vital mineral from their British rulers. And the tax wasn’t so small either, it was a huuuge tax
I believe the United States was wrong for expanding west because not only did they upset the natives of these areas, but also caused many major conflicts between explorers and natives.
(sorry i couldn't add more i can really think of to much more)