This statement is false.
If he were to double the amount that Emily has to get franks, franks would have more.
Look :)
Emily's = 300
Frank's = 300 x 2 = 600
now...
Emily's = 300
Frank's = 600
So frank has more! NOT fewer.
Answer:
3/2 or 1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Convert (-3 1/3) to -10/3
Now its -5/(-10/3)
The 3 is multiplied by the -5
(-5)(3)/(-10)
=(-15)/(-10)
The negatives cancel and it reduces to 3/2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let 
. We have that 
if and only if we can find scalars 
such that 
. This can be translated to the following equations:
1. 
2.
3. 
Which is a system of 3 equations a 2 variables. We can take two of this equations, find the solutions for 
and check if the third equationd is fulfilled.
Case (2,6,6)
Using equations 1 and 2 we get
whose unique solutions are 
, but note that for this values, the third equation doesn't hold (3+2 = 5 
6). So this vector is not in the generated space of u and v.
Case (-9,-2,5)
Using equations 1 and 2 we get
whose unique solutions are 
. Note that in this case, the third equation holds, since 3(3)+2(-2)=5. So this vector is in the generated space of u and v.
Answer:
49.85
Step-by-step explanation:
41 is the mean, so half of the daily requests are above that number, half below, the question is about numbers above the mean, so the lower numbers won't be included in the percentage.
The difference between 59 and 41 is 18. The standard deviation given is 6.
18 ÷ 6 = 3 So that is 3 standard deviations. The empirical rule states that 99.7 of all values are within 3 standard deviations from the mean. But we are looking at only the upper half of those values so 99.7 ÷ 2 = 49.85 %
If the answer asks for approximate, you could round to 49.9 or 50.
And tell the math people to learn the correct spelling of fluorescent!
Answer:
<h2>(-10, 2, 6)</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
