Answer:
The correct answer is have a low value-to-weight ratio.
Explanation:
Products that have low weight-value ratios (for example, coal, iron ore, bauxite and sand) also have low storage costs but high movement costs as a percentage of their sales price. Inventory management costs are calculated as a ration of the value of the product. Low product value means low storage cost, since inventory management costs are the dominant factor in storage cost. When the value of the product is low, transport costs represent a high proportion of the sale price.
Consequently, companies that deal with products of low value for weight frequently try to negotiate more favorable transport rates; rates are generally lower for raw materials than for finished products of the same weight.
Answer: B. One asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the journal entry at the time of sales will be represented as:
Debit Accounts receivable $1,750
Credit Sales $1750
Now, when the credit receipt is received as illustrated in the question, the journal entry will be:
Debit Cash $1,750
Credit Accounts receivable $1,750
Therefore, one asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect.
The correct option is B.
The answer is B,"Yes, eventually their debts must be repaid with interest.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": the revenue a government created by printing money.
Explanation:
<em>When the government prints more money, there will be more supply of it. A higher supply of money tends to increase general prices causing inflation. Therefore, households will have to pay more money for goods and services which implies they will be paying more taxes, benefiting the government since it will have more money to finance its projects.
</em>
The previous practice mentioned is implemented by governments that are not willing to increase the interest rate directly.
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
