The double-declining-balance and straight-line depreciation methods Produce the same total depreciation over an asset's useful life.
- Two of the four depreciation methods permitted by US generally accepted accounting standards are the straight-line and double-declining-balance depreciation procedures (GAAP).
- The sum of the years' digit and units of production are the other two techniques. By deducting the salvage value from the asset's purchase price and either dividing the depreciable amount by the number of years or applying a preset rate to the depreciable amount, the straight-line method is derived.
- The depreciation rate is calculated using the double-declining-balance technique by dividing 100 percent by the asset's useful life in years, then multiplying the result by two.
- The diminishing amount is then used to calculate depreciation expenditure until only the salvage value is left. They therefore result in the same depreciation over the course of the asset's useful life.
<h3>Is double declining balance a method of straight-line depreciation?</h3>
- The straight-line depreciation technique, another and arguably even more frequent type of depreciation, depreciates an asset's value at a rate that is half that of the DDB depreciation method.
<h3>What is double declining balance depreciation method?</h3>
- A type of accelerated depreciation method called the double-declining balance method doubles the rate at which an asset's value depreciates compared to the straight-line approach.
- Accelerated depreciation refers to the process of depreciation that occurs twice as quickly as the straight-line method.
Learn more about double-declining-balance here:
brainly.com/question/24296752
#SPJ4
Answer:
5,409 books
Explanation:
to calculate break even point in units we can use the following formula:
break even point in units = total fixed costs / contribution margin per unit
- total fixed costs = $53,000
- contribution margin per unit = sales price - variable costs = $12 - $2.20 = $9.80
break even point in units = $53,000 / $9,80 = 5,408.16 ≈ 5,409 books
in $, that would equal = 5,409 books x $12 per book = $64,908
Answer:
The bond's yield to maturity is greater than its coupon rate.
Explanation:
At a discount, the price of the bond is less than its face value, from bond theory principles, this is likely to happen when YTM is more than the coupon rate of the bond. Due to this the present value of the coupons and their face value are going to be lower than 1000 since YTM is greater.
The coupon rate is given as annual interest divided by face value
While
The yield is interest/ current price.
The answer to the question is therefore
The bond's yield to maturity is greater than its coupon rate.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
If this is an actual question for an extremely religious school put yes. but this doesn't actually happen.
Answer:
The correct answer to this question is A) because resources are not equally good in each production activity.
Explanation:
PPS or Production possibility frontier ( which is often as production possibility curve ) shows the possible combinations( of two products or services) with maximum outputs that can be produced in an economy when all the available resources are fully and efficiently used.
The reason why opportunity cost is increased while moving along PPS is because when we increase the output of one good , that means we are allocating more resources towards this good ,that means we will be left with the fewer resources to carry out the production of other good , so therefore the opportunity cost would increase.
