The correct answer is:
The author's purpose for the allusion is to emphasize how seriously the relationship is doomed.
Romeo and Juliet was a tragic story. Two star-crossed lovers who could not be together, and have a sustaining relationship. Comparing Sasha and Karl to this really shows how these two face a similar proposition. Their relationship is doomed. They can't be together like Romeo and Juliet could not be together.
Answer:
A(n) <u><em>monochronic</em></u> American visitor to <u><em>polychronic</em></u> Egyptian client may be frustrated as he or she waits for meetings to begin then finds the meeting regularly interrupted.
Explanation:
Monochronic can be described as a culture in which the people belonging to that culture like to do one thing at a time. These people do not like interruptions.
On the other hand, polychronic people tend to do multiple tasks at a given time.
The interruption of a meeting will be frustrating for any person whether the person be a monochronic or a polychronic.
The correct answer is<em> a local person accused of murder</em>
.
In the case of the city or country court, they would hear the case of a local person who is being accused of murder. It has more relevance than a resident fighting a ticket for parking on a city street. The city or country court do not have jurisdiction in the case of a state senator accusation of illegal gambling. So, the person accused of murder is the most important one for the court.
I would honestly have to go with B on this one.
