Answer: A) Liberty versus stability and order
Explanation:
Scenario not attached but this should be the correct answer.
In the debate about surveillance in the United States, the principles of liberty and stability and law and order seem to always clash. The bone of contention is that people should have the liberty to live life as they want without worrying about the government snooping on them.
The principle of stability and order however, calls for surveillance so that behavior that is not in the best interests of the country can be curbed.
For this reason, these two principles keep clashing in reference to surveillance.
It depends on what type of government the country is. Take an example, Great Britain (England, Britain, whatever it is called.) is a monarchy, which means that they have royal families... like how we have the president. (in the U.S at least) It can also be dependent on what the country decides to do, or the president decides. I hope this helps!
Answer:firstly....you don't know the persons reactions to what you are conversing....and some body languages are cut short cause u are not together.u can't shake that your friend why talking to him...some good English are lost cause u not conversing in person so you free to text what you wish......first we shouldn't use short form of words all the time....cause it affects our brain and we might even be tempted to write like this during exams
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
A line has a general equation of
where b is the y-intercept and slope of m.
Since 
is the value of y when 
, it is the point of intersection of the line with the y-axis, hence the y-intercept is 
.
We are given the slope is 
So the equation of the line is
