All categories

3 years ago

What argument did Andrew Jackson use to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision?

2 answers:

ozzi3 years ago

8 0

Andrew Jackson tried to persuade people by stating that people were still savages. So their incorporation was a mistakes due to the government might have ruin their policies and fail. He considered legitimate to remove them from the territory since they were not capable of being like the rest of the people.

Explanation:

He declared that they were still barbarians and that trying to understand them has been a failure because the government often slaughtered its own policies or they failed. This is why it was acceptable to exclude them from their territories since they were still savages according to him, and the rest of what resembled to the Native Americans is history.

juin [17]3 years ago

3 0

You might be interested in

Help me with english please

ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

1) C

2) B

3) D

4) C

5) B

6) D

7) D

8) A

Explanation:

can i get brainliest

4 0

3 years ago

Find the option which best identifies the line below

quester [9]

I believe the answer is B a complete sentence

7 0

3 years ago

What is the incorrect pronoun shift in ...it is important for a person to be prepared before you adopt a pet

Minchanka [31]

I think the incorrect pronoun shift would be the line "before you adopt a pet". I think it should be before one adopts a pet. This is because the sentence started with "It is". The "you" made the sentence very confusing. The second pronoun should be singular, the pronoun you is often denoted as plural and not singular.

4 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from The Odyssey.

GrogVix [38]

Answer:

Anger and pride

Explanation:

He is proud of himeself and shows this to be his biggest weakness of all. By revealing his name he showed that he was proud to have fooled the cyclops Polyphemus and in doing so cursed his men into having to stay at sea by the wrath of Posiedon

4 0

3 years ago

This impact was felt from the bottom up, and these contributions to

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

It is a compound-complex sentence

Explanation:

To answer this question we need to understand what the definitions are:

A simple sentence has just one independent clause or one complete thought. It has one subject, one verb, and modifiers.

A complex sentence has one independent clause (one subject, a verb, its modifiers, and a complete thought; this sentence can stand alone) and one dependent clause (it doesn't have a complete thought, it depends on the independent clause).

A compound sentence has two independent clauses, they can stand alone, both of them have a complete thought, and they are joined by coordinating conjunctions 'and', 'but', 'or'.

A complex-compound sentence has two independent clauses that can stand on their own without losing a complete thought, and one dependent clause (it can't stand alone; it depends on the independent clause).

So let's look at the given sentence:

This impact was felt from the bottom up, and these contributions to

American institutions may be the ones which most intimately affect the

lives of all Americans.

We can see that the first clause is independent - This impact was felt from the bottom up - it has a complete thought; it can stand alone.

The other clause is also independent - and these contributions to

American institutions may be the ones - it has a complete thought; it can stand alone; it is connected to the other clause with coordinating conjunction 'and'.

The last clause is the dependent clause - which most intimately affects the lives of all Americans - it can't stand alone; it doesn't have a complete thought. To be exact it is an adjective clause, it explains the noun 'contributions' or the pronoun 'one'.

So, we have two independent clauses and one dependent. It is a complex-compound sentence.

I hope it helped you :)

3 0

3 years ago