d. Both were based on unconstitutional state laws.
Answer:
<em>the people were denied many rights and were forced into poverty</em>
Explanation:
Mexican Revolution
The Mexican Revolution was a series of conflicts that lasted for more than two decades. It saw the overthrow of the dictator Diaz Mori. <em>The revolution began in 1910 and was caused by the dissatisfaction of the Mexican populace with the denial of their basic rights, forcing many into poverty and servitude.</em>
Diaz was more about building foreign ties with other countries and the US and wasted no time in signing away lands to foreigners and wealthy Mexicans. Also no Mexican was allowed to own a land unless they held a title.
A major difference between socialism and capitalism resides in how likely meritocracy is to flourish .
Socialism, in its rightest essence, would ensure that every individual within society enjoyed the same opportunities at the core (quality health, food, education). Naturally, some of these subjects would thrive more than others and therefore be promoted by society to hold higher levels of responsability and reward.
However, the lesser gifted would never be at a disadvantage. They could still count on standard quality support by the same society and equal opportunity for their offspring to pursue their own ambitions.
On the contrary, capitalism creates a societal gap by supporting inherited advantage. In summary, a capitalist society provides better core opportunities for a group of citizens and their offspring regardless of their innate ambitions. The disadvataged group and their offspring then receive a less than standard core support which predisposes them for hardship in the pursue of societal reward.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The South Carolinian that spoke out against integrating public schools in South Carolina was Strom Thurmond.
Strom Thurmond (1902-2003) was a politician and Congressman from South Carolina. For almost 48 years he was a Senator from his state. He was a racist and opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and did not hide his opposition to integration. To the opposite, he always supported racial segregation in South Carolina.
"That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
