I bet those will be worth a good amount of money when you’re older wow
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
A Functional Sociologists views a formal social structure like the
Indian Caste System as a system that had a purpose in that time, as part of the social, economic, and political presence in India.
Functionalists sociologists believe that all the norms, institutions, and rules in society serve a particular purpose. In this case, all the parts of the system had to work together, in harmony, to provide the results needed.
Let´s remember that the Caste System was very rigid in India, and people had no chances to change their status. In a caste system such as the implemented in India, people could have specific talents but they could not develop them. They were assigned tasks that had to be done all his life.
Answer:
The cartoon expresses a view of utter contempt for Chamberlain, who was the British Prime Minister at the time.
Explanation:
The Munich Agreement was signed by Britain, France, Italy (Germany's ally), and Germany, and what the pact allowed Germany to annex a portion of Czeckoslovakia named the "Sudeteland", mostly inhabited by Ethnic Germans.
Hitler had threatened with starting a war if the pact was not signed, and claimed that the Sudeteland would be the last land annexation of Nazi Germany in Europe.
British leader Chamberlain, and French leader Philippe Pétain believed in Hitler's word, and signed the agreement.
The agreement was obviously a failure, because only a year later Germany would launch the invasion of Poland, starting World War II.
For this reason, both Chamberlain and Pétain are seen by historians as ineffective leaders.
