Answer:
On March 10, 1922, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was arrested on charges of sedition by British officials in Bombay (now Mumbai), India. He was sentenced to six years in prison for his involvement in protesting the British colonial government in India. ... A little more than a year later, Gandhi was assassinated
Explanation:
Is this the answer you were looking for?
<span>The stripes on the American flag are white and red is the only choice where the verb properly agrees with the subject. All of the other choices have verbs that are used incorrectly.</span>
Answer:
Hawk Hill should remain open because it is the only park we have with a lake where people can swim and fish.
Explanation:
Based on the reason the student gave for why he wants to save a city park which was that the Hawk Hill was his favorite park and was free to visit, the best detail to add to support to saving the park would be to argue that it should remain open because it is the only park that has a lake where the people can swim and fish.
Answer:
Explanation:is this a serious question?
Answer:
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987), a Harvard Education and Psychology professor, became famous for a theory that some have called “the most important theory of moral development of the twentieth century” 1). Kohlberg's theory of moral development, which is heavily influenced by Piaget's theory and Kantian ethics, is an attempt to universalize ethics in an era when moral relativism has the popular vote.
Explanation:
The theory (which will not be covered in detail) involves three moral levels, each of which includes two developmental stages (six stages in total). These levels are the Preconventional, Conventional, and Postconventional. The levels and stages do not show a set of rules that we must follow, but are meant to explain how moral reasoning develops and how people from all cultures arrive at their moral conclusions.
As many other prominent theories, Kohlberg's idea has attracted criticism from both psychological and philosophical sources. However, since resistance abounds, we will only focus on some of them in a very basic way, beginning with two general criticisms, identified by Lapsley as the 'naturalistic fallacy' and the 'aretaic judgments' problem 2). We will then explore Kohlberg’s most important critic: Carol Gilligan. Said objections will be followed by a short overview of Kohlberg’s answers to them.
No, I do not agree with the criticism.
