Answer:
<u>Views on the federal government</u> -- The Nullification Crisis provides evidence into Andrew Jackson's political and constitutional thinking. While Jackson believed in a strict construction of the Constitution and in states' rights, he believed that when the Constitution had delegated power to the federal government, the federal government had to be supreme.
<u>Beliefs in personal freedoms</u> -- The Nullification Crisis also revealed the depths of alienation which existed among the cotton planters of the Deep South as early as the 1830s. This alienation did not go away, nor did the desire to seek to formulate a constitutional construction that could alleviate planter grievances - namely, economic domination by northern commercial interests and the fear that the federal government might tamper with the institution of slavery. In many ways, the Nullification Crisis was a rehearsal for the political and constitutional crisis of the 1850s that would culminate in the American Civil War.
<u>12th amendment and the "corrupt bargain"</u> -- 12th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of United States which describes the procedure of selecting President and Vice President and Corrupt bargain is the term used to refer to the incidents about Political agreement in the American history. In elections of 1824, the race for white house was razor thin with a winner engaging in a crooked deal that became known as the "Corrupt Bargain".
Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.
Explanation:
The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.
Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.
What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).
In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.
In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.
Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.
Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.
Answer:
What one makes of all this will depend in part on how one understands the American political tradition. Many liberals view the rejection of liberalism as an alarming threat to "liberal democracy" — and American democracy, in particular — along with the institutions and values associated with it, which include representative government, the separation of powers, free markets, and religious liberty and tolerance. Their concerns are valid, insofar as some of liberalism's most vocal critics on the right and left indict the American political project and its founding as both misbegotten and irredeemably liberal.
<u>Answer:</u>
Judicial review is the power of the Judicial Branch to review laws, Executive orders, and Executive acts to ensure they are Constitutional and are not in conflict with higher authorities.
Option: (A)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Judicial review ensures that the laws made by legislative and executed by executive doesn’t violate the terms of a constitution.
- Judicial review is one among the "balances" and "checks" in separation of power.
- Judicial review supervises legislative and executive to form laws that doesn’t conflicts with the 'constitution'.
- Judicial review invalids the laws that violates the 'terms of a constitution'.
Here is the answer of the question above. The Crazy Horse lured American troops into a deadly ambush because they (American troops) <span>thought it was a small raiding party. Hope this answers your question. Thanks for posting. Let me know if you need more help next time. </span>
