Answer:
Just world hypothesis
Explanation:
The JUST WORLD HYPOTHESIS is the cognitive bias or assumption that a person's actions are basically likely to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all good actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished.
The just-world phenomenon is the tendency to believe that the world is just and that people get what they deserve. Because people want to believe that the world is fair, they will look for ways to explain or rationalize away injustice, often blaming the person in a situation who is actually the victim.
The JUST WORLD PHENOMENON helps explain why people sometimes blame victims for their own misfortune, even in situations where people had no control over the events that have befallen them.
It is also a belief that people get the outcomes in life they deserve. For instance, if you want to experience positive outcomes, you just need to work hard to get ahead in life. One negative consequence is people's tendency to blame poor individuals for their plight. Blaming poor people for their poverty ignores situational factors that impact them, such as high unemployment rates, recession, poor educational opportunities, and the familial cycle of poverty.
This is a tricky question, since it depends what usage of the words is meant, but the best answer is: a fact.
He is treating the topic of whether the global warming is real or not and all our evidence strongly points to the fact that it is, in fact, real.
In the common usage of the word, we are talking about a fact - the best answer is b).
However, in science, the facts are referred to as "theories" - even gravity which we all experience, is known as a "theory", so there are also good arguments for the option c).
However, as I said, in the common understanding of the word, these theories are facts - if we disprove them, we stop calling them theories, and they are only hypotheses.
<span>One source of conflict are "personal" differences.
</span>
Indeed, we are generally extraordinary individuals, so it bodes well that we will all have contrasts, correct? Indeed, we are regularly attracted to other people who have some particular contrasts from us. The familiar maxim expresses that "opposites are drawn toward each other", which is regularly valid. The issue is that distinctions that draw us together can now and again turn into a wellspring of contradiction.
Observation of infants and toddlers entails. Observation of infants and toddlers entail an ongoing process of thoughtful looking, listening, questioning, and looking again.
Answer:
Abstract
Much of the literature about globalization exaggerates the degree of novelty. In this review, we concentrate on claims about what has changed about cities under late capitalism and globalization. Although we suggest that cities have long been influenced by global forces, we conclude that the roles of cities in the global system have changed considerably as a result of the time-space compression made possible by new transportation, communication, and organizational technologies. After discussing what the global perspective means within anthropology, and how it affects urban anthropological research, our review concentrates on three complex issues. First is whether the global factory and increasing knowledge-intensivity have decreased or increased the utility of the intermediary or brokerage roles that cities play. Second, we examine changes in how people live in globalizing cities. Third, we consider the implications of the construction and maintenance of relationships across borders for processes of citizenship, affiliation, and transnational social movements.
Publisher information
Annual Reviews was founded in 1932 as a nonprofit scientific publisher to help scientists cope with the ever-increasing volume of scientific research. Comprehensive, authoritative, and critical reviews written by the world's leading scientists are now published in twenty-six disciplines in the biological, physical, and social sciences. According to the "Impact Factor" rankings of the Institute for Scientific Information's Science Citation Index, each Annual Review ranks at or near the top of its respective subject category.
