1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
10

Sasha is writing an essay about a fictional text that was written in 1904. The text is in the public domain, meaning that it is

no longer protected by copyright.
Should Sasha take steps to avoid plagiarizing the text? Why or why not?

A.Yes. It is never appropriate to use someone else's words as your own.

B.Yes. There are financial penalties for plagiarizing texts that aren't copyrighted.

C. No. The text is so old that no one will know whether Sasha is using her own words or someone else's words.

D. No. It’s fine to copy the text word-for-word and pass it off as her own because the copyright is no longer protected.
English
1 answer:
katrin2010 [14]3 years ago
6 0

A.Yes. It is never appropriate to use someone else's words as your own.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP, super easy
mart [117]

Answer:

Explanation:

the answer is d

hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence from "Broken Chain" best expresses a theme related to working towards a goal?
solong [7]

Answer:A last week he did 50 sit ups........

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Present perfect tense for i stick it with glue
8090 [49]

Answer:

I <u>have stuck</u> it with glue.

Explanation:

Present perfect describes something that occurred or was the state of things at an unspecified time in the past.

e.g I<u> have walked</u> on this path before.

5 0
3 years ago
Which plural spelling rule should you follow to make church plural?
Eva8 [605]
This question is very confusing. That answers have nothing to do with the question.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which historical events do the authors include to support the claim in this passage? Select two options. details of Marie Antoin
DedPeter [7]

Question:

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.

In France, there was no Parliament or Congress; no one expected to be able to protect his rights by voting. But even in the land of King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette, the people demanded to be heard. In July 1789, Parisians stormed the Bastille, the hated prison where the king locked up anyone he disliked. And in August, the newly defined National Assembly issued the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen. "Men are born and remain free and equal in rights,” it announced to the world. Here it was again, Pierre Lemerre’s phrase, Jefferson’s phrase, the principle Clarkson was fighting for—indeed, he came to France to support the new government. And yet the Declaration also said that "property is an inviolable and sacred right.” So what were slaves? Equal human beings, or goods that belonged to their owners? Human rights versus property rights. That argument goes on today as, for example, we debate how closely to regulate coal mining. Is it best to let owners set rules, which is likely to give all of us cheaper coal, or to have the government set standards, which is more likely to protect workers and the environment? In France, one side argued that slaves must be freed. The other said that to change anything in the sugar islands would invite slave revolts, help France's rivals, and thus hurt the nation.

Which historical events do the authors include to support the claim in this passage? Select two options.

A) Details of Marie Antoinette’s actions at the Bastille

B) Specific details about the modern sugar industry

C) A quotation from the Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen

D) A summary of political changes related to human rights in France

E) A description of revolts in the sugar islands

Answer:

The correct answer is C)

Explanation:

The passage depicts the argument between two opposing ideas about the freedom of people and slavery.

The authors cited the declaration of rights of man and the citizen in the 5th and 7th sentences.

If Humans were born free and entitled to their freedom and if they were also entitled to keep their properties, the question was what happens to slaves?

Slaves were properties owned by people.

The challenge with the opposing ideas was that on one side of the argument, there was an inherent assumption that slaves were not humans but properties.

Cheers!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is ironic about Juvencio fierce desire to live?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help:
    8·2 answers
  • Rewrite the following sentences using vivid adjectives and avoiding slang and nonstandard English.
    11·2 answers
  • What should be avoided in literary analysis?a.quoting the textb.literary termsc.transitionsd.plot summaries?
    13·1 answer
  • Which event occurs at the climax of the play?
    9·1 answer
  • ASAP! GIVING BRAINLIEST! Please read the question THEN answer CORRECTLY! NO guessing. I say no guessing because people usually g
    11·1 answer
  • Would you rather be forced to dance every time you heard music or be forced to sing along to any song you heard?
    9·1 answer
  • Help!! For each box below, briefly describe a moment from Fahrenheit 451 where the theme of "thinking freely" comes into play. W
    13·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from a play.
    13·1 answer
  • What are the example of syneedoche from deep water chapter class 12​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!