The Whig Party<span> was a </span>political party<span> active in the middle of the 19th century in the United States. Four </span>US presidents<span> belonged to the party while in office.</span>[5]<span> It emerged in the 1830s as the leading opponent of Jacksonians, pulling together former members of the </span>National Republican<span> (one of the successors of the Democratic-Republican Party) and </span>Anti-Masonic Parties<span>. It had distant links to the upscale traditions of the </span>Federalist Party<span>. Along with the rival Democratic Party, it was central to the </span>Second Party System<span> from the early 1840s to the mid-1860s.</span>[6]<span> It originally formed in opposition to the policies of President </span>Andrew Jackson<span> (in office 1829–37) and his </span>Democratic Party<span>. In particular, the Whigs supported the supremacy of the </span>US Congress<span> over the Presidency and favored a program of </span>modernization<span>, banking, and economic </span>protectionism<span> to stimulate manufacturing. It appealed to entrepreneurs, planters, reformers and the emerging urban middle class, but had little appeal to farmers or unskilled workers. It included many active Protestants, and voiced a moralistic opposition to the Jacksonian </span>Indian removal<span>. Party founders chose the "Whig" name to echo the </span>American Whigs<span> of the 18th century who fought for independence. The underlying political philosophy of the American Whig Party was not directly related to the </span>British Whig party.[7]<span> Historian Frank Towers has specified a deep ideological divide:</span>
Allows a federal court to review proposed legislation to ensure legality before passage into law
He fixed the economy in a role of secondary political hands of the press and people to speak he wasn’t known for his communication skills but he got the job done and in the end healed the economy
Maybe while we wait for the questioner to provide the options, we can do a little general discussion here about what it means to use a primary source. Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied. So, any diary entries or letters of George Washington himself would count as primary sources. So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents that came from Washington's pen as president. Or the testimony of contemporaries of his who lived or worked with him would also count as primary source accounts.
So if you're looking for a historian's use of primary sources, look for the ways in which he's using historical material directly connected to the life of the person being studied. In fact, if you were able to look at a set of the false teeth George Washington wore, that would be a primary source too. They have a set at the Mount Vernon home/museum. And by looking at those actual dentures, you'd see they weren't made out of wood like the old (false) story says!
negotiating with employers
Strikes
