Answer:
Waste damage are so useless. It is like some waste product that can not be used.
The correct answers are:
_________________________________________________________
b. immediately after the information or quotation to be documented ;
_________________________________________________________
c. enclosed in parentheses;
_________________________________________________________
d. very brief .
_________________________________________________________
<u>Note</u>:
_________________________________________________________
Choice: [A]: "immediately after the last page of the text "— is INCORRECT. This refers to the "Works Cited" section — { in MLA format }.
____________________________________________________________
Choice: [E]: "complete information about a source" — is INCORRECT.
To the contrary, "<u>in-text citations</u>" are: "very brief" — {refer one of the correct options — [D]: "very brief" .}. In fact, MLA format style —or any format style—cannot — and does not provide <em><u>complete </u></em>information about a source in any part of the the work. This would, literally speaking, be impossible. Also, for the most part, in many cases, this would be impractical, as well. This would apply <u><em>particularly </em></u> to "<u>in-text citations</u>". Furthermore, the MLA format—and the many other scholarly formats —have provisions for the inclusions of more thorough information about sources used in a "Works Cited" [e.g. MLA format] or "Citations" or "References" or "Footnotes" or even "Annotated Bibliography". Additionally, these provisions tend to provide sufficient information for the scholar/other reader to allow for <span>to find/access/verify any credible sources (e.g. journals, books, other publications) — should anyone desire.
____________________________________________________________
As such:
____________________________________________________________
Choice: [F]: "</span><span>gives the exact information as on the works-cited list" — is INCORRECT. Furthermore, the "in-text citations" provide easy reference for the reader to specific — and more detailed — description of the source in the "Works Cited" section at the back of the paper — with minimal distraction to the reader.
____________________________________________________________
<u>Note</u>: The "MLA" stands for the "Modern Language Association" .
____________________________________________________________
Hope these answers—and explanations — have been helpful to you.
Best wishes in your academic pursuits!
____________________________________________________________</span>
I perhaps view politics a bit in reverse from most people. I see it as an expression of society and the state of a culture. Not only are politics ubiquitous but one can only understand them when they see them in every day life.
<span>It's like a river. If you want to study a how a river flows, you can't scoop some water up. You have to understand several factors to why a river flows. Trying to isolate it will never reveal even that simple thing to you. If you really want to understand politics, study psychology and sociology. Study military history and especially study mass movements. </span>
<span>Only studying the specific occurrences is really just a matter of memorization, you won't ever understand politics until you realize that it being ubiquitous is a fundamental principle of politics. Don't get caught up on looking at one puzzle piece that you never realize where to put it.</span>
In the Declaration of Sentiments, wrote by Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott for the Seneca Falls Women´s Rights Convention in 1848, some the rhetorical features were used I order to convey the ideas of the inequality of rights between men and women and the oppression women suffered by men. In these lines those features were Arrangement, because it was structured as a list, been clear and easy to internalize, Style that as the structure influences in the way people will receive the information, and, finally, Memory, seen on the repetition of the oppression idea reiterated in each sentence beginning with “He has…” to emphasize men oppressive behavior.