The Midnight Judges Act<span> (also known as the </span>Judiciary Act of 1801; 2 Stat. 89<span>, or the </span>Midnight Appointments<span>) represented an effort to solve an issue in the </span>U.S. Supreme Court<span> during the early 19th century. There was concern, beginning in 1789, about the system that required the Justices of the Supreme Court to “ride circuit” and reiterate decisions made in the appellate level courts.</span>[1]<span> The Supreme Court Justices had often voiced concern and suggested that the judges of the Supreme and circuit courts be divided. President </span>Thomas Jefferson<span> did not want the judiciary to gain more power over the executive branch.</span>
Hey! How are you? My name is Maria, 19 years old. Yesterday broke up with a guy, looking for casual sex.
Write me here and I will give you my phone number - *pofsex.com*
My nickname - Lovely
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options, we can say the following.
Esther is a psychologist who has been working for the past year as a therapist with one of the parents currently going through a bitter divorce. She would be ethically required to abstain from conducting a custody evaluation on behalf of the court in this case because it would be hard for her to remain objective.
As Esther has been listening to the issues of one of the parents during the process of divorce, one way or the other she could have some subjective approaches about the process in favor of her client. She is the therapist and a professional and has been listening to her clint's complaints and suffering through the process. That is why she should abstain from conducting a custody evaluation on behalf of the court in this case because it would be hard for her to remain objective.
Answer:
Yes.................... you're right
Answer D. It is based on shared concepts that people define for themselves.