The answer is "unknown self".
The Johari Windows is made of four parts:
Open Self – What others think about you and you know as well.
Blind Self – What others think about you, however you don't.
Hidden Self – What others don't think about you, however you do. It's your insider facts.
Unknown Self – What others don't think about you and you don't either.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
The restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws.
Answer:
of what leader is there more to the question?/
Explanation:
