Table/indexed.
Let's look at the three options and see what their advantages and disadvantages are:
Contiguous - In this scheme, the file is stored in contiguous blocks of the disk. It allows for easy random access of the data, but requires a contiguous sequence of blocks large enough to handle the entire file. Since the size of the file specified in this question varies quite a bit over it's lifespan, you're either going to be wasting a lot of space by having an allocation large enough to handle the maximum sized file, or the file will need to be copied whenever it grows and "bumps" into a file that was allocated after it. Because of this, this method is not the best.
Linked - The file is stored as a single, or double linked list of file blocks. This allows for the file to grow or shrink as needed, using only the amount of space needed for the file. Unfortunately, this storage scheme doesn't allow for random access of the file contents and the file can only be accessed sequentially. The question for this problem doesn't specify how the file is being accessed, so as long as random access isn't required, then this would be a reasonable allocation scheme. But I'm assuming that random access will be required, in which case, this scheme isn't ideal.
table/indexed - In this scheme, some disk blocks are used as tables to point to other disk blocks that actually contain the file data. It's almost as fast as contiguous allocation for random access of the file contents, yet allows for the growth and shrinkage of a file like linked allocation. As such, it handles all use cases at a relatively minor cost in total storage required. So this would be the most appropriate allocation scheme since the file access behavior wasn't specified in this question.
Just take away 8 from both sides so you're left with x=10
The answer is; "these sites have <span>increased the cross-price elasticity for substitute products".
</span>
When we evaluate the responsiveness
of the demand for any good towards the change in the price of a related good
is known as cross price elasticity of demand and it is
always measured in terms of percentage.
Correct question:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is _________ correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Group of answer choices
A. less efficient than
B. as efficient as
C. either more or less depending on the elasticity of demand
D. more efficient than
Answer:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
<h3>Correcting a market with taxation:</h3>
- The government can discourage the consumption of harmful products by raising taxes on them.
- Cigarette and alcohol taxes, for example, are raised on a regular basis to discourage their consumption and limit their adverse impacts on unconnected third parties.
<h3>Command and control strategies:</h3>
- Command and control is a sort of environmental regulation that allows policymakers to expressly regulate both the amount and the procedure by which a company should maintain environmental quality.
- Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
<h3>Reason -</h3>
As it is stated above Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
Therefore, Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Know more about market correction here:
brainly.com/question/2626419
#SPJ4
