Answer:
Explanation:
Liability of Petri:
On all the purchases, if payment is made within 30days from delivery, Petri gave the authority of a 5% discount to Adam. Upon extension of credit to customers, no terms were given to Adam.
In the case under consideration, Adam explicitly gave a false representation of his authority to get more sales on his account and thus, Petri is NOT accountable to John on his terms with Adam.
Liability of John:
Being a customer to Petri, John has to discover the detailed terms on discount and other payment terms with Petri when he called Petri. John is also accountable to make clarifications whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount and making payment in three installments.
In the case under consideration, John has failed to find the exact details on whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount. Thus, he is accountable to make the payment of $9500 in 30days.
Answer:
Option "Inversely" is correct.
Explanation:
Option “Inversely” is correct because the increase in price level exhibits inflation and a rise in inflation decreases the purchasing power of money. However, if the price level decreases or inflation decreases, then the purchasing power of money increases. Therefore we can see that increase in price level decreases the purchasing power and a decrease in price level increases the purchasing power. Therefore, there is an inverse relationship.
Answer:
C) relaxed and alert at the same time
Hope this helps! 'v'
Canada, Australia, and South Africa use tax brackets.
Answer:
Negative reinforcement
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement is a behavioral psychology principle that occur when one's action allows him / her to escape an unfavorable action before it occurs.
It is mentioned in the scenario that Sheppad is being bullied and criticized by Alexandra , being the boss's sister .
Susan's idea of completing all work including the extras is a behavior intentionally put up to escape the constant unpleasant stimuli from Sheppad.
