Answer:
B. It must argue a point that can be challenged by others.
Explanation:
Argumentative thesis can represent a claim that is debatable and can be opposed by reasonable people. Statements about common knowledge, generally known and accepted fact or fields of general agreement cannot be argumentative theses, as few people can disagree about them.
<span>Stalin feared they might spread ideas that went against the Soviet government.</span>
We have freedom of speech to say what we would like too. But if it degrades out higher power’s then it’s technically against the law. For social justice we can only say proven facts, anything else can we classified as a act of terrorism if we speak out again the government. Exp. Dr. Martin Luther King.
The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2645376
Answer:
................communicate capabilities and services in a transparent and convenient form to the nomad moving from place to place
