it allow s U.S corporation to move out of the U.S where wages are cheap
Answer:
He would pay a fine.
Explanation:
Using Greenleafable's answer (he/she is a the brainly level Quality Assurance), I am going to say that, "It says in article 198 that hurting a freed man would result in paying a fine. Whipping and things like that happened for other people in the situation or if the man paying the fine did not have the money to pay a fine.
<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
The correct answer is D.
The creation of free trade zones is a trade policy that consist on opening the national markets to foreign agents and therefore on eliminating trade barriers with other countries. The possibility of free entry attracts foreign capital and leads to higher levels of investment. Those new projects started with foreign money will need workers to function, and therefore will end up increasing employment too.
Such approach is opposite to the establishment of protectionist measures, which consist on setting trade barriers (custom duties such as tarriffs, quotas, etc.), and that would lead to the results explained in options A, B and C. It tariffs are set the goverment would increase the income earned from charging customs duties and the tariffs would prevent the free entrance of foreign competition. If the entry of foreign products and services is blocked is very likely that the influence of foreign countries decreases in South Korea.
<span>This means the relationship between Church and State. As we know there are many views and opinions regarding this matter. We can find this in history which tells us the liberty of the people and the moral responsibility that is given to them in that liberty. We can find this in the first amendment of the constitution.
I hope it helps, Regards. <span>
</span></span>
