Answer:
linguistic relativity
Explanation:
Linguistic relativity involves regarding all dialects as equally logical and effective means of communications, and it also avoids to classify speech patterns within a grading system. Therefore, according to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, language influences the thoughts and judgements of their speakers. As a result, no dialect is better than another - each dialect leads to its speakers to have different viewpoints and jump to different conclusions.
Answer:
easy here
Explanation:
“The Indian Burying Ground” is a short lyric poem of forty lines celebrating the spirits of Native Americans haunting their sequestered graves in the North American wilderness. It is an early American example of the Romantic movement in Western literature. Although its elegiac subject matter harks back to the eighteenth century British school of “graveyard” poetry, Philip Freneau adds a Romantic twist to the sepulchral theme of human mortality. This writer displays a Gothic fascination with supernatural phenomena and moonlit scenes of fancy, a primitivistic attention to unspoiled natives and pristine nature, a nostalgia for a legendary past, and an interest in the spellbinding powers of the imagination (or “fancy”) as superior to the reason of the European Enlightenment. In lyric form and fanciful poetic theme, Freneau bears close comparison to William Collins in eighteenth century England.The poem opens with a primitivistic speaker in the guise of a common man challenging civilized burial customs, which betray what a culture thinks of the state of death. When civilized culture demands burying a corpse in a prone position, death is seen as an eternal sleep for the soul.
If readers consider not the European past but the antiquity of the New World, however, they contemplate America’s primordial race of Indians, whose sitting posture in their graves suggests that their souls actively continue the simple pursuits of their former mortal lives, as depicted on their pottery and as indicated by their weapons. For example, an Indian arrowhead, or “head of stone,” symbolizes the opposite of a European headstone—namely, the enduring vitality of the dead person’s spirit, unlike the cold, engraved memorial for a dead white man
« The Battle of Freeman’s FarmThe Nullification Crisis »Hamilton Vs. Jefferson
December 29, 2006 by Ando
I had intended to post Part II of the WWI question last night, but got caught up doing movie reviews on Life of Ando. So to slake your ravenous historical thirst in the meantime, here is my assignment from my history class this past week. If you’re really into American history and how the politics of the early Republic shook out, Jefferson vs. Hamilton is a great study. It’s also a little, I guess comforting, to know that as bad as we think today’s politicians are, politics was always a very dirty game. Like Bismarck said, “Laws are like sausages. Better to not see them being made.” And as Ecclesiastes says, “There’s nothing new under the sun.”
1) How did the political philosophies of these men differ?
Most clear thinking Americans could probably tell you at least the rudimentary facts of who Thomas Jefferson was. Far fewer would likely have a definite idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what his contributions as a Founding Father were. Yet his conception of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both founders foresaw the new nation as a great future power, and both had very different maps of how to get it there.
Jefferson believed the nation’s strength lay in its agricultural roots. He favored an agrarian nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was very opposed to a strong central authority and believed that the people were the final authority in government. Jefferson also encouraged active support for the French Revolution
Hamilton favored a strong central authority. He believed a strong government was necessary to provide order so that business and industry could grow. He envisioned America becoming an industrial power. To this end he sought to establish a national bank and fund the national debt in order to establish firm base for national credit. Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” He opposed involvement in the French Revolution and worried Jeffersonians by appearing, and maybe even being, too cozy with Britain.
Answer:
The correct answer is: respectful.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, Sancho expresses his respect and admiration towards Sterne. Sancho considers Sterne as a human being who should have his rights and tries to motivate him to fight against slavery. He also shows his appreciation towards Sterne, by saying that he has a benevolent heart and by praising his acts of charity. Sancho is sure that Sterne will be a great fighter for human rights.
<em>Thoughts and Sentiments on the Evil of Slavery</em> is a book written by Ottobah Cugoano, published in 1787. This book describes the life of slaves in Great Britain and calls for the abolition of slavery and the emancipation of slaves in order to prevent future enslavements.
Answer:
THe answer is C if you quote information from a print or from a digital source you must cite it
Explanation:
