A third party is any party which compites for votes since it has failed to outpoll its two strongest rivals. These political parties rarely win elections because their proportional representations are not used in federal or state elections, only in some municipal elections. In the U.S. electoral politics, a third party could be the Libertarians and Greens, while the most important leading political parties are the Democrats as well as the Republicans.
Third-party politics since 1860 are best described by the following options...
1) The Bull Moose party was formed by a former Republican President and Jane Adams. The Progressive Party or The Bull Moose Party which was created by Roosevelt and his delegates became a third party in the election of 1912.
3) The Reformed party, led by Ross Perot, tried to make a run in the race between George H. Bush and Bill Clinton. The Reform Party was founded in 1995 by Ross Perot who received 18.9% of the popular vote as an independent candidate in the 1992 presidential election.
4) The House of Representatives has no separate place for a third party candidate to sit. The Republican party and Democratic party have dominated American politics in a two-party system since 1856,
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, the benefits of projects to dam rivers in the Columbia Basin have outweighed their cost because these projects provides large benefits to the Columbia. They produces energy from these projects of dams as well as stored the water which can be used for agriculture purposes. So for producing energy from these dams, more money should be invested which increase and outweighed the cost. Due to these projects, more barren land can be converted into fertile agricultural land.
Secretary of war is the answer
Jamestown was founded in 1607.
Massachusetts was founded in 1788.
So 181 years passed between.
Answer:
The disability rights movement has also ignored issues of importance to women with disabilities and many feminists with disabilities have complained about its male domination and male orientation (Blackwell-Stratton, et al., 1988; Toews, 1985). Deegan and Brooks (1985: 1) have criticized the disability rights movement for directing most of its attention to male concerns while women's issues, such as child-bearing problems, have received little attention. They point out that, "Like many other social change movements, the disability movement has often directed its energies toward primarily male experiences." This makes many feminists with disabilities uneasy members of the disability rights movements, for example, Israel and McPherson (1983: 20), who describe how "Disabled feminists...feel uncomfortable in the disability movement because it is often male dominated and at times blatantly sexist."
Please make me Brainliest! :))
