1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
4 years ago
12

The British and the colonists had many conflicts in the time before the American Revolution. What conclusion can be made about w

hy so much conflict occurred in Boston? was it because The king wanted to control Boston because the wealthiest colonists lived there, The British did not like Boston because most colonists there did not own slaves, The people of Boston were taxed by the king, while Southern colonies were not, or The king was enforcing more policies in Boston as an example to all the colonies.
History
1 answer:
Andrej [43]4 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) The British did not like Boston because most colonists there did not own slaves.

The British and the colonists had many conflicts in the time before the American Revolution. The conclusion that can be made about why so much conflict occurred in Boston is "the British did not like Boston because most colonists there did not own slaves."

Problems were many and people were very angry with the monarchy of England. Not only in Boston, but in all the 13 colonies. Heavy taxation was imposed on the American colonies by the British monarchy. This decision did not like the American people and they were upset with the British government. Americans had to pay more taxes and the worst thing was they had no voice or representation in Parliament. American people reacted and in Boston, they participated in the Boston Tea Party protests of December 16, 1773, where they dumped 342 chests of British tea into the Boston harbor. Incidents like this led to the Revolutionary War. There was also the Boston Massacre on March 5, 1770.

You might be interested in
How old are the Nazca mummies?
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

they can be very old to explain

6 0
3 years ago
What did Columbus believe about the earth before he began exploring?
pochemuha

Answer:

the earth was round

Explanation:

Christopher Columbus to knew that the Earth was around when he proposed to reach India by sailing west from Spain to knew that the Earth was round

6 0
3 years ago
According to the two migration theories, how might people have settled the Americas?
Zina [86]

Answer:

From 1932 to the 1990s, it was thought the first human migration to the Americas actually took place around 13,500 years ago, based on spear points discovered near Clovis, New Mexico. You may have heard of this referred to as the "Clovis-First Model." Over the last 20 years however, the discourse surrounding the story of the first Americans has come into a new light -- one that challenges the previously accepted theories and replaces them with even more shocking and exciting ones.

With these new ideas, the question regarding the story of the first Americans needed to be asked again: if those proverbial first Americans didn't populate the continent over the Bering Land Bridge, who were they, where did they come from and when, and how did they get here? It began in 1997 with the discovery of an archaeological site in Monte Verde, Chile, dating back to 14,500 years ago - a full millennium older than what was previously thought to be the first people in the new world, and indicating they settled much further south than expected.

Although there was strong debate regarding the dating of the Monte Verde findings, it brought up an interesting question: if humans settled in the Americas so much earlier than previously thought and traveled as far as South America, is it possible that these humans journeyed to the new world through a different route?

One radical theory claims it is possible that the first Americans didn't cross the Bering Land Bridge at all and didn't travel by foot, but rather by boat across the Atlantic Ocean. Though the evidence for this theory is minimal, proponents argue that the artifacts were developed by an earlier and still more ancient European group, known as the Solutrean culture. This style bears an uncanny resemblance to that of the Clovis tools found in the United States, which could suggest that humans may have entered America from the east over a route that has been dubbed the Atlantic Maritime route.

A somewhat more widely accepted maritime theory looks to modern cultural anthropology and linguistics, claiming a striking resemblance between the cultures of Australia, Southeast Asia, and South America. Support for this idea is found partially in the discovery of a 9,500 year old skeleton in Washington State. Dubbed the "Kennewick Man," the skeleton bears a strong physical resemblance to the Japanese Ainu people, suggesting that a pan-Pacific journey via boat might have brought the first Americans to our shores.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why were economists opposed to the terms of the Treaty of Versailles?
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

They thought the world would suffer Germany could not repay its  huge debts.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Versailles was the treaty prescribed to be signed by the Allied powers and Germany. It was intended to be a peace document that was to be singed after the first World War. The treaty demanded the compensation for all the losses that the civilians of the Allied nation had faced during the War. Also, it was stated in the document that actions can be taken by the Allied powers if Germany failed to give the payments. It was estimated by the economists that shortly, Germany would not be able to provide shelter and basic amenities to the inhabitants.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement best completes the
Nimfa-mama [501]

I believe your answer is D.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was President Wilson's perspective of Germans in the U.S.?
    15·1 answer
  • What event happened after the Qin Dynasty collapsed?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Martin Luther’s account of his break with the church change between 1517 and 1535
    12·1 answer
  • True or False: The difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is the Declaration states goals or ph
    9·2 answers
  • 13.Which of the following does not have to happen for a bill to become a law?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements was not true of the 1862 Homestead
    11·1 answer
  • A major progressive business reform that President Taft enacted was?
    7·2 answers
  • Hey shawtyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
    14·2 answers
  • Comparison of faith? judaism, christianity, and islam.
    14·1 answer
  • What were the result or results of the contact between the Aztecs and the Conquistadores? What happened to the Aztec culture? Ho
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!