1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
2 years ago
7

What does san-culottes mean

History
2 answers:
Olegator [25]2 years ago
6 0
A lower class Parisian republican in the French Revolution / an extreme republican or revolutionary. Sorry if this isn’t what you were asking, it’s how I understood it!
Alexxx [7]2 years ago
4 0

Sans-culottes (from French "without breeches") is a term from the French Revolution that refers to the Parisian workers and petty bourgeois who wore long knickerbocker pants, in contrast to the breeches worn by nobility, as they were suitable for work. Sans-culottes were therefore people who lived from physical labor. There were usually small craftsmen, journeymen, traders and innkeepers. The Sans-culottes became politically influential because they supported the Jacobins, but they pursued different political goals.

You might be interested in
Why were the border states so important to the north during the civil war
mariarad [96]
They had no slave population
7 0
2 years ago
In the cartoon, now-prosperous immigrants object to further immigration to America. What is the meaning behind the prosperous im
Lorico [155]
In the cartoon, now-prosperous immigrants object to further immigration to America. The meaning behind the prosperous immigrants' shadows is that there is an underlying secret to how the immigrants became prosperous or their lives are in danger because they are more prosperous than the locals.
7 0
2 years ago
The western roman empire was defeated by barbarians from the:
aleksandrvk [35]
What is now known as Germany or the Germanic Region
3 0
2 years ago
Should the United States Have Annexed the Philippines?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

The U.S. should have annexed the Philippines because it would’ve given us a larger sphere of power and influence. However, you could argue this larger sphere of power is bad because this is what got the Spanish in the conflict in the first place, the more land they occupied, the more revolutions from the people, and the annexation of the Philippines did in fact cause a revolt and a more deadly one, 4,200 Americans and over 20,000 Filipino soldiers were killed, and 200,000 Filipinos civilians were killed from famine, disease, and violence.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
In his arguments in Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for Linda Brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools wer
kkurt [141]
The Lawyer of Linda Brown claimed that those schools were racist and segregated students based on archaic and incorrect beliefs that there is genetic difference between white and black people in which the African-Americans are not as developed. Of course, the supreme court ruled that we are all equal and the schools were forced to put the students together.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Adolf Hitler laid out his ideology in a book called the Munich Chronicles <br> True <br> False
    11·2 answers
  • What was a "pudding" in colonial New England?
    14·1 answer
  • On what three questions did the national debate over reconstruction center?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the combined effect of the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of
    7·2 answers
  • What caused Europeans to search for a water route to Asia?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best defines the holodomor
    7·2 answers
  • Who organized the "Great Demand" march?
    12·1 answer
  • Relationship between European nations and American people?
    14·1 answer
  • How does the Twelfth Amendment achieve its goal
    11·1 answer
  • CHECK MY ANSWER:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!