1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
2 years ago
14

What was an affect of the us increase in production during World War II. It gave the allies the advantage to win the war

History
1 answer:
astra-53 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It allowed for the allied powers to be supplied and fully equipped during the entirety of the war as well as out producing the Germans and Japanese.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which product would have been most likely traded in this area?
dexar [7]
I think the answer is metal
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late-1800s, where were the immigrants from who faced discrimination that arrived on the west coast? The United States gov
jok3333 [9.3K]
<span>You are probably talking about Chinese immigrants in the United States, who began immigrating into the country in 18th century. Thousands of Chinese workers went to the California Gold Rush looking for work, while thousands more were hired to build the First Transcontinental Railroad. Treatment of Chinese immigrants are particularly harsh since they become targets for populist politicians and white laborers. In 1882, the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed which barred practically all Chinese from entering the United States for 10 years.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was not a cause of the Spanish-American War in 1898? A. President McKinley's desire for war B. the sinking of the Maine C.
disa [49]
Srry i'm soo late but the answer is A. President McKinley's desire for war. 
Hope i Helped :)
3 0
3 years ago
Are there any complanies like.the East India Companies in existance today? how are they different?
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer

British East India Company. It turns out, that India was never originally colonized by the British crown, but by a multinational company (MNC). Robert Clive, who won the Battle Of Palashi (‘Plassey’ for ‘Hey bear, ek gin and tonic idaar!’ folks), was an employee (‘Team Leader’ in 21st-century terms) of the world’s first public limited company. (Britons had equity stakes and to make favorable trading deals, the company ended up having an army.)That hired army ended up ousting the weak-by-then Mughals and accidentally ended up with a nation. Ours. Yes, a large company, so influential and powerful, that it made laws of another nation. The modern equivalent would be if, say, Coca-Cola removed the Chinese premier and started running it. It’s unheard of, mad. But that’s what happened, and that is how I am writing this column in English and you’re reading it in English, both parties pretending as we folks have always been English speakers and writers. All because a bunch of company middle management wanted to protect their investments and threaten some nabobs for their tea and silk and spice and opium trade. And the company’s armies also meted out their version of justice. This begs the question: can a company do that? Today, if you visit the dockland area of London from where the East India Company ships once sailed, hundreds a day to rule Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras, there’s a wildlife reserve, a jogging track, an indoor concert hall called the O2 Arena, a bunch of suburban high-rises that look a bit like Whitefield in Bengaluru, and an HSBC call center. Zero signs that it was once the epicenter of the imperial world, ruling 3/4th of the planet with trade.

3 0
1 year ago
"The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest br
Korolek [52]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The given quote was stated by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Pierre Samuel Dupont de Nemours in 1816.

According to this quote, Jefferson wanted to convey the message that the majority rule is necessary to preserve the liberties of all. He viewed majority rule as a perfect rule to govern.

According to majority rule, a vote is given to the one who gains vote more than half. Jefferson viewed majority rule as an essence of the democracy.

So, the correct answer is option C.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did people criticize the French Nobility, the king Louis XVI and the clergy?<br> 
    13·1 answer
  • Cite examples of changes brought about by a shift from rural to urban living.
    10·2 answers
  • Major mountians in frankish kingdom
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following constitutional amendments provides for the principle that government should”provide for the common defens
    6·2 answers
  • Many of the amendments deal with rights of the accused in our system of justice. Describe some rights that the fifth through eig
    15·1 answer
  • The $787-billion stimulus package enacted by the federal government in 2009 to try to deal with the great recession was intended
    12·1 answer
  • Does a country need to expand and dominate other countries to be a world leader?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did most of the fighting in the Civil War happen
    6·1 answer
  • What was false about Classical Greek religion
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following states the purpose of the 1962 Second Vatican Council? to bring about an end to slavery to spread the Cat
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!