Answer:
The Great Alaska earthquake struck at 5:36 p.m. Alaska Standard Time on March 27, 1964. The shaking lasted for more than four minutes, launching several deadly tsunamis and triggering killer landslides. The earthquake also transformed geology, because it revealed that oceanic plates are shoved under continents.
Explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed. 
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The left side of the equation will result in a rational number, which could be a non-perfect square.
Explanation:
According to the Pythagorean theorem, the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.
Take 

As  ,
,  
 
Here, 29 is not a perfect square.
So, c is irrational.
If a is a rational number and b is a rational number, c could be an irrational number as the left side of the equation will result in a rational number, which could be a non-perfect square.
 
        
             
        
        
        
They have 9 justices they each serve a different purpose. they hear cases and controversies arising under the constitution or US law and controversies that involve the United States as a party of entities and parties of different states that are appealed from federal courts or state courts there hasn’t always been 9 justices on the court the US Constitution establishes Supreme Court but they left the Congress to decide how many justices should make up the court the judiciary act of 1789 said the number at six but that later changed