Why is trade considered mutually beneficial?

2 answers:

8 0

Trade is considered beneficial between two parties as d. both parties can then gain a voluntary as well as a non fraudulent exchange. It thus would create a value and would raise living standards. Hope this answer would then be of big help.

pickupchik [31]3 years ago

3 0

The trade considered mutually beneficial because both parties gain as a result of voluntary. non-fraudulent exchange.

Answer: D

Explanation

Through this method, both parties benefit as they share their resources. Not only resources but also their relationship and reputation increases.

Without mutual benefits, trade won't happen between. No one is self-sufficient with their resources, so the importance of trade is huge when it comes to trade between two parties.

Trade involves exchange for one good to another, good sin return for money, goods in return for service, money for service, etc.

You might be interested in

What would you guys do if u had a lots of money??Gimme a reason.Plzz do fast.I need it urgent.

labwork [276]

Answer: I i had a lot of money, I would splurge greatly and invest in silver

8 0

3 years ago

Why is the enlightment considered a turning point in the world history

oee [108]

The Enlightenment is often considered a turning point in world history because philosophers and thinkers of this time period had an enormous impact on the creation of knowledge and information for the centuries that followed this period. Also the ideas of the Enlightenment had an enormous impact on governments and political movements specifically in regards to ideas such as human rights, natural rights, and also democratic governance.

4 0

3 years ago

a federal law that concerns itself with the relationships between a business firm and labor unions is

Stels [109]

The answer to this question is <span> National Labor Relations Act.
The </span><span> National Labor Relations Act was established in order to protect the righ of both employees and employers.
This act encouraged both employees and employers to do collective bargaining so an arrangement where both sides are satisfied with the working conditions could be achieved.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

According to john gottman and his colleagues, when one partner's first negative expression is reciprocated with an escalation of

lesantik [10]

When one partner’s first negative expression is reciprocated with an escalation of negativity, this will likely reflect refusing to accept influence in which a person is likely to behave of refusing an effect that is offered to him or her such as an individual’s behavior or development.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of these is not a reason why some firms do no strategic planning?

zvonat [6]

Answer:

Laziness

Explanation:

Strategic planning refers to the process of clearly defining the future plan where the company is headed along with specific list of actions, resources allocation, and budgeting that the company need to do to get there.

Strategic planning will most likely be good for every company, but it does not necessarily needed for the company to profit. Often times, the scope of operation was too small for strategic planning to be necessary. (For example, many small restaurants or other forms of small private owned businesses can generate a profit without having to make strategic planning). Laziness is not a valid reason why some of them chose not to do it.

6 0

3 years ago