Carl Jung work would Penelope likely cite to explain the observation.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There is frequent appearance of some characters, though the fact that the cultures Penelope is studying had little or no connection with each other. So, its most likely that Penelope would refer to Carl Jung's concept of archetypes, as he has been associated with such similarities.
As Jung states, these archetypes are collective unconscious of the common content that is being observed. Such common contents have their different appearance in myths, dreams, art, and stories. Also, such characters appear in literature and can be traced back to myths such as the hero.
Efficacy is getting matters. it's far the potential to produce a desired amount of the desired effect or fulfillment in attaining a given intention. efficiency is doing things in the maximum low-priced manner. it's far the ratio of the output to the inputs of any device (appropriate input to output ratio).
Efficacy and effectiveness are close enough which means that they're regularly used interchangeably in contexts. however, effectiveness is regularly extra especially used inside the context of the way something accomplishes an assignment while efficacy conveys the quantity to which something accomplishes its task in any respect.
Learn more about efficacy here:
brainly.com/question/10575222
#SPJ4
It is true that myths are based on religion or on supernatural events
The answer is "C. Kenneth Starr."
The Starr Report was an investigative record of United States President Bill Clinton by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and discharged on September 11, 1998. Vast parts of the report were composed by Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Preeminent Court appointee.
Starr additionally asserted that Clinton at the same time deferred declaration for seven months and misled potential thousand jury witnesses by freely denying the relationship, and hence perpetrated a criminal lawful offense by declining to testify. When Clinton made his case about his association with Lewinsky to people in general, nonetheless, he was not under pledge and in this way it legitimately was not a felony. There was likewise no confirmation that Clinton carried out witness altering by secretly denying the relationship to these witnesses and requesting that they affirm to support him.