The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
Answer:
The correct answer is down below please read it well I couldn't summarise it too much to only occupy a few lines because it is too extense.
Explanation:
Options to decrease the aspect of the absence of independence in the first place are that the employment of a committee of audits to choose the auditors is delegated to directors that are not part of management. Also that all the changes and updates on auditor as well as the reasons backing them have to be reported to the SEC or any other regulatory institution. As well as the approval of the CPA firm by the stockholders in the annual meeting.
The second one is that the Sarbanes-Oxley act demands that the audit committee of a public company has to be integrated by independent members and have to cover duties of appointment, termination, and compensation of the audit firm.
Answer:
The method used above is convenient sampling.
Explanation:
- With convenient sampling, the data to be sampled is picked randomly among the relevant population that is close to hand.
- The randomly picked population acts as samples through which the analysis is done and later on a conclusion reached out of the results.
- In the given context, the researcher obtains data of 45 students from the , this is the close at hand data that he uses, this is the readily available data with which he can conduct his research.
- This makes the research a convenient method type.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
To judgment analysis, prisoner's dilemma relates to the phenomenon wherein two people behaving in their very own self-interests may not yield the desired outcome. The traditional prisoner's dilemma is structured up in a manner that the both sides attempt to defend themselves at the other respondent's disadvantage.
The prisoner's dilemma poses a scenario whereby two people, split and therefore unable to interact, have to determine among helping or not helping with each other. For each group the greatest reward comes where both sides agree to compromise.
Answer:
Limited government means the government does not have all of the power. Federalism is when the states, or provinces, share the power. So all in all it's saying that because of federalism, the government does not hold all power over the citizens.
