The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:
Justice and liberty I think are two great adjectives for due process of the law.
Answer:
1) The act of implicating oneself in a crime or exposing oneself to criminal prosecution.
Answer: I believe that it is B
Why? The Marshall Plan was an American initiative passed in 1948 for foreign aid to Western Europe. The United States transferred over $12 billion in economic recovery programs to Western European economies after the end of World War ll.
Also you can do process of elimination and say
A makes no sense
C is prohibiting the export of “arms, ammunition, and implements of war” from the United States to foreign nations at war
D again really makes no since
E was put into law by our 5th president in 1823 (World War 11 happened in the 1940s)
So it has to be B
Hope this helps :D
For the first question i think you meant United Nation, If so it is true and the second one is also True. Where there there will always be refugees.
