Answer:
I imagine myself being proposed to during a walk in the woods. As I live near a forest area, I would love to go on a picnic through the woods, and whilst we are hiking, I would be completely unaware of the future events to take place. Me and my (maybe) future spouse would climb near a nice grassy open area preferably near a stream (because water is cool), and eventually I would be proposed to.
I doubt I would be proposed to, as I think I am more likely to propose to someone I feel connected to. I'm particularly picky about people, so it's very unlikely for me to accept any kind of proposal.
The way I imagine proposing to someone is to announce that I have to be out late for work one night, perhaps for overtime or some other circumstance. I would ensure that I got home at a particularly late time, and whilst the person is asleep, would set up a display in a part of the house that I decide. In the morning, I would have to make sure to get up before them, and I would make breakfast for them to make sure they stay in the room they were in. After eating, I would lead them into the displayed room with my hands over their eyes, and turn them around. I would get down on one knee and ask them the big question, and I would present them with a ring that they may have chosen sometime earlier. I don't like surprising people to an extent where they may feel stressed, so they would know I would be proposing sometime, they just wouldn't be sure exactly when. (And don't worry, I bought the ring)
We can actually infer that the type of context described in this passage is: Historical context.
<h3>What is historical context?</h3>
Historical context actually refers to the information in a passage that tells about what is going on in the world when it was written.
Thus, we see here that the passage here gives a historical context.
Learn more about historical context on brainly.com/question/2456335
#SPJ1
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
"The Selective Laziness Of Human Reasoning" is an article written by Tania Lombrozo. The aticle talks about how people tend to focus on the flaws of others argument than evaluating their own arguments. To prove this thesis, a research was conducted by the researchers in which the choice blindness concept was adopted. The choices that were made by the participants were swaped and mostly people failed to recognize the swap and presented their argument over the choice that they did not make previously.
<u>The correct option to support the claim of the main idea of the text is C. When the choices made by participants were swapped and not recognized by them, they produced the argument over the choice that they did not make and were critical about the arguments they produced when they were coming from others</u>.
So, the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. B force.
2. C friction
3. D sandy floor.
4. B opposite.
5. B
hope dis helps.
but i'm not sure about 3 and 5
