The bundle that is going to maximize profit is going to be Late
<h3>How to find the bundle that would maximize profit</h3>
we have the net profit from early to be 7 + 5 = 12
We have the net profit from late to 6 + 10 = 16
We can see that the value for late is greater at 16 compared to that of the early.
Hence we can say that late has the greatest profit.
Next we have to solve for the profit that is made. This is the net profit.
The solution is given as 16 - 12 = 4
<h3>What is profit maximization</h3>
This is the process where by businesses would try to get the best output possible from the given inputs that they would use in the business. It goal is to be able to maximize the returns that they would make.
Read more on profit maximization here:
brainly.com/question/13464288
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Project 1:
Initial investment = $120,000
Cash inflow Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5 = $40,000
Hence,
Annual cash flow = $40,000
Payback period:
= Initial investment ÷ annual cash inflow
= $120,000 ÷ $40,000
= 3 years
Therefore, the payback period for Project I is 3 years.
Answer:
The short run refers to a period of less than one year.
Explanation:
The statements is false that the short run refers to a period of less than one year.
The short run, long run and very long run are different time periods in economics.
<u>Short run – where one factor of production (e.g. capital) is fixed</u>.
long run – Where all factors of production are variable,
Unlike in accounting where operating period refer to a period of one year, <u> there is no hard and fast definition as to what is classified as "long" or "short" and mostly relies on the economic perspective being taken.</u>
A. credit transaction
Your bank would pay the bill then either charge you for using their money or remove it from your "checking account" depends on the way you have it set up
The answer to this question is Simple;informal
Simple contracts usually will be used if the transaction happens in small scale (it held small amount of value)
Which means that both parties either believe in one another or they simply do not care enough about the contract to care about the legal precautions.
