Which of the following is a reasonable conclusion based on the map?

History

2 answers:

Nostrana [21]3 years ago

7 0

__________________________________________________________

tatuchka [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Based on the map, a reasonable conclusion is that most states in the Northeast and Midwest decreased in total population, losing representatives.

Explanation:

The map shows the House of Representatives' apportionment of 2010, in which Ohio (Midwest) and New York (Northeast) lost more than 2 representatives, while other states from those regions, like Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Massachussetts lost a representative in the House.

This happened at the same time that southern states like Texas and Florida increased their representation in the House, as a result of the population increase in these states.

You might be interested in

For a brainlist

murzikaleks [220]

The federal government protect more of the interests of big business than the farmers, Native Americans, factory workers

The Gilded Age describes the period where gross materialism and enormous political corruption were at peak in the U.S. Sphere during the 1870s.

During the Gilded Age, various businessmen bribed public officials at the all level and fraud/manipulation were massively used to influence elections.

Therefore, the Option B is correct because the federal government protect more of the interests of big business than the farmers, Native Americans, factory workers.

Read more about this here

<em>brainly.com/question/8207456</em>

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following would not be an issue supported by modern progressives?

Natasha2012 [34]

I think it is d if I'm wrong I'm sorry

5 0

3 years ago

What is the "melting pot" theory? A. Immigrants from all over leaving America in search of better lives back home B. Immigrants

tatiyna

D. American Indians protesting the influx of immigrants