The Fourteenth Amendment protects individual rights by:

History

2 answers:

kumpel [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

After the Civil War, Congress adopted a number of measures to protect individual rights from interference by the states. Among them was the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits the states from depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

NeX [460]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

<h3>The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and establish. </h3>

You might be interested in

The United States was drawn into world war 1 because of Germany’s invasion of Belgium the sinking of the and the Zimmermann

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

The correct answer is Lusitania.

<em>The United States was drawn into World War with because of Germany’s invasion, the sinking of the Lusitania and the Zimmerman's note. </em>

On May 7, 1915, the German Army sank the RS Lusitania, as part of the hostilities during World War I. The sinking was part of the German attack to the British submarine because the British established a naval blockage to the navy of Germany. This action, the German invasion and the Zimmerman's note, where the Germans promised help to Mexico, were the reasons why the United State entered World War I.

3 0

3 years ago

Describe two types of terracotta warriors

ss7ja [257]

Answer:armored infantry, unarmored infantry

Explanation:

armored infantry, unarmored infantry

armored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantryarmored infantry, unarmored infantry

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

how did the supreme court define the role of the federal government in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819

Artist 52 [7]

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John Marshall's finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave Congress broad discretionary power to implement the enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in ringing language, the radical states' rights arguments presented by counsel for Maryland.

At issue in the case was the constitutionality of the act of Congress chartering the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1816. Although the Bank was controlled by private stockholders, it was the depository of federal funds. In addition, it had the authority to issue notes that, along with the notes of states' banks, circulated as legal tender. In return for its privileged position, the Bank agreed to loan the federal government money in lieu of taxes. State banks looked on the BUS as a competitor and resented its privileged position. When state banks began to fail in the depression of 1818, they blamed their troubles on the Bank. One such state was Maryland, which imposed a hefty tax on "any bank not chartered within the state." The Bank of the United States was the only bank not chartered within the state. When the Bank's Baltimore branch refused to pay the tax, Maryland sued James McCulloch, cashier of the branch, for collection of the debt. McCulloch responded that the tax was unconstitutional. A state court ruled for Maryland, and the court of appeals affirmed. McCulloch appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1819.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What power does the constitution give the president in regards to war?

cluponka [151]

He is the commander in chief

6 0

3 years ago

What was the difference between Booker T. Washington's Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, and most other colleges?

yKpoI14uk [10]

C I think is the answer

5 0