Raja was a strong leader who used to govern, whereas Dasa or Dasi are captive slaves who once served their lords. This is how the lives of the two groups differed. Raja is able to make sacrifices, unlike Dasa or Dasis.
A slave was not autonomous, although a raja was. Rajas enjoyed respect due to their position of authority. But in most instances, a slave must have drawn jeers and sympathy.
The rajas had no cities, palaces, armies, or tax collection systems. In general, sons did not always succeed their fathers as rajas.
Later, the word evolved to refer to a slave or dasa. Men and women who were taken during the war became slaves. They were treated as the owners' property, and the owners had the right to demand that they perform any tasks.
Learn more about life of raja:
brainly.com/question/779907
#SPJ4
1. Even though
2. Despite
3. Nevertheless
4. Whereas
5. Though
6. Still
7. In spite
8. On the other hand
9. Whereas
10. Still
Answer: He conveys that many different arguments can be presented against socialism.
Explanation: The rest don’t make sense, there is no process nor is it in order of importance. The next option says each point is a logical result of the previous one but each of the arguments don’t seem to connect to the previous.
What is gothic lit? I’ll answer if ya tell me :)
The answer to your question would be the first choice, the year 2053.
